Researching Complex and Multi-Level Workplace Factors Affecting Disability and Prolonged Sickness Absence

The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose There is growing research evidence that workplace factors influence disability outcomes, but these variables reflect a variety of stakeholder perspectives, measurement tools, and methodologies. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research of workplace factors in relation to disability, compare this with employer discourse in the grey literature, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results Predominant factors in the scientific literature were categorized as physical or psychosocial job demands, work organization and support, and workplace beliefs and attitudes. Employees experiencing musculoskeletal disorders in large organizations were the most frequently studied population. Research varied with respect to the basic unit of assessment (e.g., worker, supervisor, policy level) and whether assessments should be based on worker perceptions, written policies, or observable practices. The grey literature suggested that employers focus primarily on defining roles and responsibilities, standardizing management tools and procedures, being prompt and proactive, and attending to the individualized needs of workers. Industry publications reflected a high reliance of employers on a strict biomedical model in contrast to the more psychosocial framework that appears to guide research designs. Conclusion Assessing workplace factors at multiple levels, within small and medium-sized organizations, and at a more granular level may help to clarify generalizable concepts of organizational support that can be translated to specific employer strategies involving personnel, tools, and practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)399-416
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Workplace
Literature
Research
Publications
Industry
Organizations
Research Design
Research Personnel
Population

Keywords

  • Disability management
  • Employer practices
  • Research priorities
  • Workplace factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Researching Complex and Multi-Level Workplace Factors Affecting Disability and Prolonged Sickness Absence. / The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 399-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention. / Researching Complex and Multi-Level Workplace Factors Affecting Disability and Prolonged Sickness Absence. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2016 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 399-416.
@article{bd4aad341a50497ba88eafa897afb62f,
title = "Researching Complex and Multi-Level Workplace Factors Affecting Disability and Prolonged Sickness Absence",
abstract = "Purpose There is growing research evidence that workplace factors influence disability outcomes, but these variables reflect a variety of stakeholder perspectives, measurement tools, and methodologies. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research of workplace factors in relation to disability, compare this with employer discourse in the grey literature, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results Predominant factors in the scientific literature were categorized as physical or psychosocial job demands, work organization and support, and workplace beliefs and attitudes. Employees experiencing musculoskeletal disorders in large organizations were the most frequently studied population. Research varied with respect to the basic unit of assessment (e.g., worker, supervisor, policy level) and whether assessments should be based on worker perceptions, written policies, or observable practices. The grey literature suggested that employers focus primarily on defining roles and responsibilities, standardizing management tools and procedures, being prompt and proactive, and attending to the individualized needs of workers. Industry publications reflected a high reliance of employers on a strict biomedical model in contrast to the more psychosocial framework that appears to guide research designs. Conclusion Assessing workplace factors at multiple levels, within small and medium-sized organizations, and at a more granular level may help to clarify generalizable concepts of organizational support that can be translated to specific employer strategies involving personnel, tools, and practices.",
keywords = "Disability management, Employer practices, Research priorities, Workplace factors",
author = "{The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention} and Kristman, {Vicki L.} and Shaw, {William S.} and Boot, {C{\'e}cile R L} and Delclos, {George L.} and Sullivan, {Michael J.} and Ehrhart, {Mark G.} and Amick, {Benjamin C.} and Anema, {Johannes R.} and Elyssa Besen and Peter Blanck and Peter Blanck and Ute B{\"u}ltmann and Chan, {Chetwyn C H} and Delclos, {George L.} and Kerstin Ekberg and Ehrhart, {Mark G.} and Fassier, {Jean Baptiste} and Michael Feuerstein and David Gimeno and Kristman, {Vicki L.} and Linton, {Steven J.} and Main, {Chris J.} and Fehmidah Munir and Nicholas, {Michael K.} and Glenn Pransky and Shaw, {William S.} and Sullivan, {Michael J.} and Tetrick, {Lois E.} and Tveito, {Torill H.} and Eira Viikari-Juntura and Kelly Williams-Whitt and Young, {Amanda E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-016-9660-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "399--416",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Researching Complex and Multi-Level Workplace Factors Affecting Disability and Prolonged Sickness Absence

AU - The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention

AU - Kristman, Vicki L.

AU - Shaw, William S.

AU - Boot, Cécile R L

AU - Delclos, George L.

AU - Sullivan, Michael J.

AU - Ehrhart, Mark G.

AU - Amick, Benjamin C.

AU - Anema, Johannes R.

AU - Besen, Elyssa

AU - Blanck, Peter

AU - Blanck, Peter

AU - Bültmann, Ute

AU - Chan, Chetwyn C H

AU - Delclos, George L.

AU - Ekberg, Kerstin

AU - Ehrhart, Mark G.

AU - Fassier, Jean Baptiste

AU - Feuerstein, Michael

AU - Gimeno, David

AU - Kristman, Vicki L.

AU - Linton, Steven J.

AU - Main, Chris J.

AU - Munir, Fehmidah

AU - Nicholas, Michael K.

AU - Pransky, Glenn

AU - Shaw, William S.

AU - Sullivan, Michael J.

AU - Tetrick, Lois E.

AU - Tveito, Torill H.

AU - Viikari-Juntura, Eira

AU - Williams-Whitt, Kelly

AU - Young, Amanda E.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Purpose There is growing research evidence that workplace factors influence disability outcomes, but these variables reflect a variety of stakeholder perspectives, measurement tools, and methodologies. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research of workplace factors in relation to disability, compare this with employer discourse in the grey literature, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results Predominant factors in the scientific literature were categorized as physical or psychosocial job demands, work organization and support, and workplace beliefs and attitudes. Employees experiencing musculoskeletal disorders in large organizations were the most frequently studied population. Research varied with respect to the basic unit of assessment (e.g., worker, supervisor, policy level) and whether assessments should be based on worker perceptions, written policies, or observable practices. The grey literature suggested that employers focus primarily on defining roles and responsibilities, standardizing management tools and procedures, being prompt and proactive, and attending to the individualized needs of workers. Industry publications reflected a high reliance of employers on a strict biomedical model in contrast to the more psychosocial framework that appears to guide research designs. Conclusion Assessing workplace factors at multiple levels, within small and medium-sized organizations, and at a more granular level may help to clarify generalizable concepts of organizational support that can be translated to specific employer strategies involving personnel, tools, and practices.

AB - Purpose There is growing research evidence that workplace factors influence disability outcomes, but these variables reflect a variety of stakeholder perspectives, measurement tools, and methodologies. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research of workplace factors in relation to disability, compare this with employer discourse in the grey literature, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results Predominant factors in the scientific literature were categorized as physical or psychosocial job demands, work organization and support, and workplace beliefs and attitudes. Employees experiencing musculoskeletal disorders in large organizations were the most frequently studied population. Research varied with respect to the basic unit of assessment (e.g., worker, supervisor, policy level) and whether assessments should be based on worker perceptions, written policies, or observable practices. The grey literature suggested that employers focus primarily on defining roles and responsibilities, standardizing management tools and procedures, being prompt and proactive, and attending to the individualized needs of workers. Industry publications reflected a high reliance of employers on a strict biomedical model in contrast to the more psychosocial framework that appears to guide research designs. Conclusion Assessing workplace factors at multiple levels, within small and medium-sized organizations, and at a more granular level may help to clarify generalizable concepts of organizational support that can be translated to specific employer strategies involving personnel, tools, and practices.

KW - Disability management

KW - Employer practices

KW - Research priorities

KW - Workplace factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983372644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983372644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-016-9660-3

DO - 10.1007/s10926-016-9660-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 27550629

AN - SCOPUS:84983372644

VL - 26

SP - 399

EP - 416

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 4

ER -