Reply by the authors (for "A Look at the concept of channel capacity from a Maxwellian viewpoint")

Tapan K. Sarkar; Santana Burintramat; Nuri Yilmazer; Yu Zhang; Arijit De; Magdalena Salazar-Palma; Miguel A. Lagunas; Eric L. Mokole; Michael C. Wicks

doi:10.1109/MAP.2009.4939055

Reply by the authors (for "A Look at the concept of channel capacity from a Maxwellian viewpoint")

Tapan K. Sarkar, Santana Burintramat, Nuri Yilmazer, Yu Zhang, Arijit De, Magdalena Salazar-Palma, Miguel A. Lagunas, Eric L. Mokole, Michael C. Wicks

Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

Let us begin by stating that it is difficult to provide an adequate response that will enlighten the audience if the correspondent neither provides the necessary references nor the details of his computations that are in disagreement with the authors. Since science is evidence based, it is difficult to respond intelligently where evidence of a disagreement is missing. We will respond to Dr. Kimber's comments by addressing each paragraph separately.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	164-166
Number of pages	3
Journal	IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine
Volume	51
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2009.4939055
State	Published - Jun 15 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Condensed Matter Physics
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1109/MAP.2009.4939055

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply by the authors (for "A Look at the concept of channel capacity from a Maxwellian viewpoint")'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Reply by the authors (for "A Look at the concept of channel capacity from a Maxwellian viewpoint"). / Sarkar, Tapan K.; Burintramat, Santana; Yilmazer, Nuri; Zhang, Yu; De, Arijit; Salazar-Palma, Magdalena; Lagunas, Miguel A.; Mokole, Eric L.; Wicks, Michael C.

In: IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 51, No. 1, 15.06.2009, p. 164-166.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

@article{7ebc5ac50e4043c3a7d2871367965a9f,

title = "Reply by the authors (for {"}A Look at the concept of channel capacity from a Maxwellian viewpoint{"})",

abstract = "Let us begin by stating that it is difficult to provide an adequate response that will enlighten the audience if the correspondent neither provides the necessary references nor the details of his computations that are in disagreement with the authors. Since science is evidence based, it is difficult to respond intelligently where evidence of a disagreement is missing. We will respond to Dr. Kimber's comments by addressing each paragraph separately.",

author = "Sarkar, {Tapan K.} and Santana Burintramat and Nuri Yilmazer and Yu Zhang and Arijit De and Magdalena Salazar-Palma and Lagunas, {Miguel A.} and Mokole, {Eric L.} and Wicks, {Michael C.}",

year = "2009",

month = jun,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1109/MAP.2009.4939055",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "51",

pages = "164--166",

journal = "IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine",

issn = "1045-9243",

publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply by the authors (for "A Look at the concept of channel capacity from a Maxwellian viewpoint")

AU - Sarkar, Tapan K.

AU - Burintramat, Santana

AU - Yilmazer, Nuri

AU - Zhang, Yu

AU - De, Arijit

AU - Salazar-Palma, Magdalena

AU - Lagunas, Miguel A.

AU - Mokole, Eric L.

AU - Wicks, Michael C.

PY - 2009/6/15

Y1 - 2009/6/15

N2 - Let us begin by stating that it is difficult to provide an adequate response that will enlighten the audience if the correspondent neither provides the necessary references nor the details of his computations that are in disagreement with the authors. Since science is evidence based, it is difficult to respond intelligently where evidence of a disagreement is missing. We will respond to Dr. Kimber's comments by addressing each paragraph separately.

AB - Let us begin by stating that it is difficult to provide an adequate response that will enlighten the audience if the correspondent neither provides the necessary references nor the details of his computations that are in disagreement with the authors. Since science is evidence based, it is difficult to respond intelligently where evidence of a disagreement is missing. We will respond to Dr. Kimber's comments by addressing each paragraph separately.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66749151003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66749151003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/MAP.2009.4939055

DO - 10.1109/MAP.2009.4939055

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:66749151003

VL - 51

SP - 164

EP - 166

JO - IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine

JF - IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine

SN - 1045-9243

IS - 1

ER -