Rematch

Islamic politics, mobilisation, and the Indonesian presidential election

Dimitar Gueorguiev, Kai Ostwald, Paul Schuler

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Indonesia’s 2019 presidential election brings a rematch between incumbent Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto, though against a backdrop of increasingly active conservative Islamic movements. Analyses of this contest–as well as of contemporary Indonesian politics more generally–are often based on assumptions around which constituencies matter and which political factions they support. This paper examines those assumptions using an original dataset of fine-grained returns and census data, including a latent variable to capture the independent effect of Islamic conservatism. We find that conservative Muslim areas overwhelmingly supported Prabowo in 2014, but turned out in relatively low numbers. By contrast, rural poor areas turned out heavily for Widodo. This suggests that the conservative vote was under-mobilised and has a greater electoral potential than previously demonstrated. Given the recent mobilisation by conservative segments in society, observers should be prepared for significant shifts in the Indonesian electorate in 2019 and beyond.Abbreviations: NU: Nahdlatul Ulama; FPI: Islamic Defenders Front.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPolitical Science
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

presidential election
mobilization
politics
faction
conservatism
Indonesia
Muslim
voter
census
Society

Keywords

  • democracy
  • election
  • Indonesia
  • Islam
  • turnout

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Rematch : Islamic politics, mobilisation, and the Indonesian presidential election. / Gueorguiev, Dimitar; Ostwald, Kai; Schuler, Paul.

In: Political Science, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{ac441d66bf50406aa2b58e3e54fefb29,
title = "Rematch: Islamic politics, mobilisation, and the Indonesian presidential election",
abstract = "Indonesia’s 2019 presidential election brings a rematch between incumbent Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto, though against a backdrop of increasingly active conservative Islamic movements. Analyses of this contest–as well as of contemporary Indonesian politics more generally–are often based on assumptions around which constituencies matter and which political factions they support. This paper examines those assumptions using an original dataset of fine-grained returns and census data, including a latent variable to capture the independent effect of Islamic conservatism. We find that conservative Muslim areas overwhelmingly supported Prabowo in 2014, but turned out in relatively low numbers. By contrast, rural poor areas turned out heavily for Widodo. This suggests that the conservative vote was under-mobilised and has a greater electoral potential than previously demonstrated. Given the recent mobilisation by conservative segments in society, observers should be prepared for significant shifts in the Indonesian electorate in 2019 and beyond.Abbreviations: NU: Nahdlatul Ulama; FPI: Islamic Defenders Front.",
keywords = "democracy, election, Indonesia, Islam, turnout",
author = "Dimitar Gueorguiev and Kai Ostwald and Paul Schuler",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00323187.2019.1584733",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Political Science",
issn = "0032-3187",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rematch

T2 - Islamic politics, mobilisation, and the Indonesian presidential election

AU - Gueorguiev, Dimitar

AU - Ostwald, Kai

AU - Schuler, Paul

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Indonesia’s 2019 presidential election brings a rematch between incumbent Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto, though against a backdrop of increasingly active conservative Islamic movements. Analyses of this contest–as well as of contemporary Indonesian politics more generally–are often based on assumptions around which constituencies matter and which political factions they support. This paper examines those assumptions using an original dataset of fine-grained returns and census data, including a latent variable to capture the independent effect of Islamic conservatism. We find that conservative Muslim areas overwhelmingly supported Prabowo in 2014, but turned out in relatively low numbers. By contrast, rural poor areas turned out heavily for Widodo. This suggests that the conservative vote was under-mobilised and has a greater electoral potential than previously demonstrated. Given the recent mobilisation by conservative segments in society, observers should be prepared for significant shifts in the Indonesian electorate in 2019 and beyond.Abbreviations: NU: Nahdlatul Ulama; FPI: Islamic Defenders Front.

AB - Indonesia’s 2019 presidential election brings a rematch between incumbent Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto, though against a backdrop of increasingly active conservative Islamic movements. Analyses of this contest–as well as of contemporary Indonesian politics more generally–are often based on assumptions around which constituencies matter and which political factions they support. This paper examines those assumptions using an original dataset of fine-grained returns and census data, including a latent variable to capture the independent effect of Islamic conservatism. We find that conservative Muslim areas overwhelmingly supported Prabowo in 2014, but turned out in relatively low numbers. By contrast, rural poor areas turned out heavily for Widodo. This suggests that the conservative vote was under-mobilised and has a greater electoral potential than previously demonstrated. Given the recent mobilisation by conservative segments in society, observers should be prepared for significant shifts in the Indonesian electorate in 2019 and beyond.Abbreviations: NU: Nahdlatul Ulama; FPI: Islamic Defenders Front.

KW - democracy

KW - election

KW - Indonesia

KW - Islam

KW - turnout

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063196017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063196017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00323187.2019.1584733

DO - 10.1080/00323187.2019.1584733

M3 - Comment/debate

JO - Political Science

JF - Political Science

SN - 0032-3187

ER -