Regulating drones: Are targeted killings by drones outside traditional battlefields legal?

William C. Banks

Research output: Chapter in Book/Entry/PoemChapter

4 Scopus citations


Targeted killing is nasty business, however carried out. For the US government, the pace of targeted drone strikes has quickened dramatically in the early years of the Obama administration. If the use of sophisticated armed drone technology has become the contemporary weapon of choice for responding to terrorists and insurgents who wantonly cause civilian deaths, US policymakers, as well as society at large, have an obligation to see to it that the weapons and their use are subject to a tightly managed and accountable set of legal controls that are as transparent as possible. After the George W. Bush administration deployed drones in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars and introduced cross-border strikes in Pakistan as an adjunct to the Afghan campaign, the Obama administration accelerated their use. Central to this process was the role of targeted killing as a key element of counterterrorism and counterinsurgency campaigns against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated groups. As early as 2009, commenting on the use of drones for targeting killings in Pakistan, the former director of the CIA, Leon Panetta, said, “It’s the only game in town in terms of confronting or trying to disrupt the al Qaeda leadership.” Meanwhile, public support for the policy was strong. A January 2012 ABC News–Washington Post poll found that 83 percent of Americans approved of the administration’s use of drones for targeted killing of terrorist suspects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDrone Wars
Subtitle of host publicationTransforming Conflict, Law, and Policy
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages31
ISBN (Electronic)9781139198325
ISBN (Print)9781107025561
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating drones: Are targeted killings by drones outside traditional battlefields legal?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this