Reflections on Action Anthropology: Some Developmental Dynamics of an Anthropological Tradition

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

"Action Anthropology" was orginally conceived during work with the Mesquakie (Fox) Indians in the 1950s by Sol Tax and his students. Despute their enthusiasm and expectations, action anthropology as they conceived of it has not had a great influence on the discipline. Yet, the epistemological, practical, and methodological commitments of their approach offer important alternatives to those accepted by many of the collaborative, advocacy, and "action" research projects in which anthropologists are increasingly involved. This paper explores some of the reasons for action anthropology's lack of influence. Considered are aspects of the epistemological and sociological climated in which action anthropology developed, the reward structure for basic and applied scientific research, and the rolde of personal characteristics in the leadership and definition of disciplinary traditions. The conclusion of the analysis is that "action anthropology" still has much to offer attempts to better understand how anthropology can be made useful and relevant to policy-makers.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages10
Volume45
StatePublished - 1986

Publication series

NameHuman Organization
Volume45

Fingerprint

anthropology
taxes
action research
reward
research project
commitment
leadership
lack
student

Keywords

  • Sol Tax
  • action anthropology
  • applied anthropology
  • leadership

Cite this

Reflections on Action Anthropology: Some Developmental Dynamics of an Anthropological Tradition. / Rubinstein, Robert A.

10 p. 1986, . (Human Organization; Vol. 45).

Research output: Other contribution

@misc{e5f590697e3248adbe3e23f9da6a0976,
title = "Reflections on Action Anthropology: Some Developmental Dynamics of an Anthropological Tradition",
abstract = "{"}Action Anthropology{"} was orginally conceived during work with the Mesquakie (Fox) Indians in the 1950s by Sol Tax and his students. Despute their enthusiasm and expectations, action anthropology as they conceived of it has not had a great influence on the discipline. Yet, the epistemological, practical, and methodological commitments of their approach offer important alternatives to those accepted by many of the collaborative, advocacy, and {"}action{"} research projects in which anthropologists are increasingly involved. This paper explores some of the reasons for action anthropology's lack of influence. Considered are aspects of the epistemological and sociological climated in which action anthropology developed, the reward structure for basic and applied scientific research, and the rolde of personal characteristics in the leadership and definition of disciplinary traditions. The conclusion of the analysis is that {"}action anthropology{"} still has much to offer attempts to better understand how anthropology can be made useful and relevant to policy-makers.",
keywords = "Sol Tax, action anthropology, applied anthropology, leadership",
author = "Rubinstein, {Robert A.}",
year = "1986",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
series = "Human Organization",
type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Reflections on Action Anthropology: Some Developmental Dynamics of an Anthropological Tradition

AU - Rubinstein, Robert A.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - "Action Anthropology" was orginally conceived during work with the Mesquakie (Fox) Indians in the 1950s by Sol Tax and his students. Despute their enthusiasm and expectations, action anthropology as they conceived of it has not had a great influence on the discipline. Yet, the epistemological, practical, and methodological commitments of their approach offer important alternatives to those accepted by many of the collaborative, advocacy, and "action" research projects in which anthropologists are increasingly involved. This paper explores some of the reasons for action anthropology's lack of influence. Considered are aspects of the epistemological and sociological climated in which action anthropology developed, the reward structure for basic and applied scientific research, and the rolde of personal characteristics in the leadership and definition of disciplinary traditions. The conclusion of the analysis is that "action anthropology" still has much to offer attempts to better understand how anthropology can be made useful and relevant to policy-makers.

AB - "Action Anthropology" was orginally conceived during work with the Mesquakie (Fox) Indians in the 1950s by Sol Tax and his students. Despute their enthusiasm and expectations, action anthropology as they conceived of it has not had a great influence on the discipline. Yet, the epistemological, practical, and methodological commitments of their approach offer important alternatives to those accepted by many of the collaborative, advocacy, and "action" research projects in which anthropologists are increasingly involved. This paper explores some of the reasons for action anthropology's lack of influence. Considered are aspects of the epistemological and sociological climated in which action anthropology developed, the reward structure for basic and applied scientific research, and the rolde of personal characteristics in the leadership and definition of disciplinary traditions. The conclusion of the analysis is that "action anthropology" still has much to offer attempts to better understand how anthropology can be made useful and relevant to policy-makers.

KW - Sol Tax

KW - action anthropology

KW - applied anthropology

KW - leadership

M3 - Other contribution

VL - 45

T3 - Human Organization

ER -