Racial Differences in First Names in 1910

Andrew S London, S. Philip Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research examines concentration and similarity in the first name distributions of African Americans and whites resident in Mississippi in 1910. Data are drawn from the Public Use Sample of the 1910 Census, with names added from microfilm copies of original Census manuscripts. We find little difference in the degree of concentration of the name distributions and only modest dissimilarity in name choice. Multivariate analysis using age as a proxy for period of name assignment (birth cohort) indicates that racial differentiation in name choice increased over the period 1870 to 1910 primarily as a result of changes in the name choices of whites. We discuss these results in conjunction with the recent work of Lieberson and Bell (1992) on contemporary racial differences in naming patterns. Lieberson and Bell (1992) argue that African Americans in the contemporary period emphasize group differences by choosing “African” or “African sounding” names. In Mississippi in the period between the abolition of slavery and 1910, we argue that whites distanced themselves from African Americans by choosing increasingly the “whitest” names (e.g., those disproportionately chosen by whites). Changing naming patterns are not orchestrated group responses. Instead, they reflect emergent cultural responses to fundamental social change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-284
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Family History
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

concentration research
census
microfilm
Racial Differences
Names
slavery
multivariate analysis
social change
Group
resident
American
African Americans
Africa
Naming
Census
Cohort
Fundamental
Abolition of Slavery
Assignment
Group Differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Racial Differences in First Names in 1910. / London, Andrew S; Morgan, S. Philip.

In: Journal of Family History, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1994, p. 261-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

London, Andrew S ; Morgan, S. Philip. / Racial Differences in First Names in 1910. In: Journal of Family History. 1994 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 261-284.
@article{05c5ad440c4042f5b978024cb30d3865,
title = "Racial Differences in First Names in 1910",
abstract = "This research examines concentration and similarity in the first name distributions of African Americans and whites resident in Mississippi in 1910. Data are drawn from the Public Use Sample of the 1910 Census, with names added from microfilm copies of original Census manuscripts. We find little difference in the degree of concentration of the name distributions and only modest dissimilarity in name choice. Multivariate analysis using age as a proxy for period of name assignment (birth cohort) indicates that racial differentiation in name choice increased over the period 1870 to 1910 primarily as a result of changes in the name choices of whites. We discuss these results in conjunction with the recent work of Lieberson and Bell (1992) on contemporary racial differences in naming patterns. Lieberson and Bell (1992) argue that African Americans in the contemporary period emphasize group differences by choosing “African” or “African sounding” names. In Mississippi in the period between the abolition of slavery and 1910, we argue that whites distanced themselves from African Americans by choosing increasingly the “whitest” names (e.g., those disproportionately chosen by whites). Changing naming patterns are not orchestrated group responses. Instead, they reflect emergent cultural responses to fundamental social change.",
author = "London, {Andrew S} and Morgan, {S. Philip}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1177/036319909401900304",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "261--284",
journal = "Journal of Family History",
issn = "0363-1990",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Racial Differences in First Names in 1910

AU - London, Andrew S

AU - Morgan, S. Philip

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - This research examines concentration and similarity in the first name distributions of African Americans and whites resident in Mississippi in 1910. Data are drawn from the Public Use Sample of the 1910 Census, with names added from microfilm copies of original Census manuscripts. We find little difference in the degree of concentration of the name distributions and only modest dissimilarity in name choice. Multivariate analysis using age as a proxy for period of name assignment (birth cohort) indicates that racial differentiation in name choice increased over the period 1870 to 1910 primarily as a result of changes in the name choices of whites. We discuss these results in conjunction with the recent work of Lieberson and Bell (1992) on contemporary racial differences in naming patterns. Lieberson and Bell (1992) argue that African Americans in the contemporary period emphasize group differences by choosing “African” or “African sounding” names. In Mississippi in the period between the abolition of slavery and 1910, we argue that whites distanced themselves from African Americans by choosing increasingly the “whitest” names (e.g., those disproportionately chosen by whites). Changing naming patterns are not orchestrated group responses. Instead, they reflect emergent cultural responses to fundamental social change.

AB - This research examines concentration and similarity in the first name distributions of African Americans and whites resident in Mississippi in 1910. Data are drawn from the Public Use Sample of the 1910 Census, with names added from microfilm copies of original Census manuscripts. We find little difference in the degree of concentration of the name distributions and only modest dissimilarity in name choice. Multivariate analysis using age as a proxy for period of name assignment (birth cohort) indicates that racial differentiation in name choice increased over the period 1870 to 1910 primarily as a result of changes in the name choices of whites. We discuss these results in conjunction with the recent work of Lieberson and Bell (1992) on contemporary racial differences in naming patterns. Lieberson and Bell (1992) argue that African Americans in the contemporary period emphasize group differences by choosing “African” or “African sounding” names. In Mississippi in the period between the abolition of slavery and 1910, we argue that whites distanced themselves from African Americans by choosing increasingly the “whitest” names (e.g., those disproportionately chosen by whites). Changing naming patterns are not orchestrated group responses. Instead, they reflect emergent cultural responses to fundamental social change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970269713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970269713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/036319909401900304

DO - 10.1177/036319909401900304

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970269713

VL - 19

SP - 261

EP - 284

JO - Journal of Family History

JF - Journal of Family History

SN - 0363-1990

IS - 3

ER -