Race, Remarital Status, and Infertility in 1910: More Evidence of Multiple Causes

Andrew S London, Cheryl Elman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The dominant approach to studying historical race-related fertility differences has been to limit samples to first-married and younger women. We argue that studying historical race-related fertility differences in the context of remarriage is also important: remarriage and fertility patterns are both rooted in the biosocial conditions that produce racial disparities in health. We employ a multiple causes framework that attributes variation in fertility patterns to voluntary limitation and involuntary factors (infecundity/subfecundity). We use data from the 1910 Integrated Public Use Microdata Series and estimate zero-inflated negative binomial models that simultaneously distinguish those who are infecund (vs. fecund) and estimate the number of remarital births among the fecund. Our approach allows us to evaluate historical remarital (in)fertility differences, accounting for marital, socioeconomic, and geographic influences on fecundity and fertility, while empirically accounting for the influence of children “missing” from the household due to mortality and fostering/aging out. Consistent with past studies that emphasized poorer African American health as a major influence on involuntary infertility, we find that African American women were more likely than white women to be in the always-zero (infecund) group and to have fewer remarital births. Supplemental analyses nuance these findings but indicate that these results are robust. Overall, we find support for a multiple-causes perspective: while the findings are consistent with the adoption of deliberate fertility control among urban and higher-status women at higher parities, remarital fertility differences in 1910 also reflected greater infecundity/subfecundity among subgroups of women, especially African American women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalDemography
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

fertility
cause
evidence
remarriage
health
mortality
American
Group

Keywords

  • Health
  • Historical United States
  • Infertility
  • Race
  • Remarriage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography

Cite this

Race, Remarital Status, and Infertility in 1910 : More Evidence of Multiple Causes. / London, Andrew S; Elman, Cheryl.

In: Demography, 01.09.2017, p. 1-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d1164dce0d640a48289cfedd92cf3ae,
title = "Race, Remarital Status, and Infertility in 1910: More Evidence of Multiple Causes",
abstract = "The dominant approach to studying historical race-related fertility differences has been to limit samples to first-married and younger women. We argue that studying historical race-related fertility differences in the context of remarriage is also important: remarriage and fertility patterns are both rooted in the biosocial conditions that produce racial disparities in health. We employ a multiple causes framework that attributes variation in fertility patterns to voluntary limitation and involuntary factors (infecundity/subfecundity). We use data from the 1910 Integrated Public Use Microdata Series and estimate zero-inflated negative binomial models that simultaneously distinguish those who are infecund (vs. fecund) and estimate the number of remarital births among the fecund. Our approach allows us to evaluate historical remarital (in)fertility differences, accounting for marital, socioeconomic, and geographic influences on fecundity and fertility, while empirically accounting for the influence of children “missing” from the household due to mortality and fostering/aging out. Consistent with past studies that emphasized poorer African American health as a major influence on involuntary infertility, we find that African American women were more likely than white women to be in the always-zero (infecund) group and to have fewer remarital births. Supplemental analyses nuance these findings but indicate that these results are robust. Overall, we find support for a multiple-causes perspective: while the findings are consistent with the adoption of deliberate fertility control among urban and higher-status women at higher parities, remarital fertility differences in 1910 also reflected greater infecundity/subfecundity among subgroups of women, especially African American women.",
keywords = "Health, Historical United States, Infertility, Race, Remarriage",
author = "London, {Andrew S} and Cheryl Elman",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13524-017-0607-x",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "Demography",
issn = "0070-3370",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race, Remarital Status, and Infertility in 1910

T2 - More Evidence of Multiple Causes

AU - London, Andrew S

AU - Elman, Cheryl

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - The dominant approach to studying historical race-related fertility differences has been to limit samples to first-married and younger women. We argue that studying historical race-related fertility differences in the context of remarriage is also important: remarriage and fertility patterns are both rooted in the biosocial conditions that produce racial disparities in health. We employ a multiple causes framework that attributes variation in fertility patterns to voluntary limitation and involuntary factors (infecundity/subfecundity). We use data from the 1910 Integrated Public Use Microdata Series and estimate zero-inflated negative binomial models that simultaneously distinguish those who are infecund (vs. fecund) and estimate the number of remarital births among the fecund. Our approach allows us to evaluate historical remarital (in)fertility differences, accounting for marital, socioeconomic, and geographic influences on fecundity and fertility, while empirically accounting for the influence of children “missing” from the household due to mortality and fostering/aging out. Consistent with past studies that emphasized poorer African American health as a major influence on involuntary infertility, we find that African American women were more likely than white women to be in the always-zero (infecund) group and to have fewer remarital births. Supplemental analyses nuance these findings but indicate that these results are robust. Overall, we find support for a multiple-causes perspective: while the findings are consistent with the adoption of deliberate fertility control among urban and higher-status women at higher parities, remarital fertility differences in 1910 also reflected greater infecundity/subfecundity among subgroups of women, especially African American women.

AB - The dominant approach to studying historical race-related fertility differences has been to limit samples to first-married and younger women. We argue that studying historical race-related fertility differences in the context of remarriage is also important: remarriage and fertility patterns are both rooted in the biosocial conditions that produce racial disparities in health. We employ a multiple causes framework that attributes variation in fertility patterns to voluntary limitation and involuntary factors (infecundity/subfecundity). We use data from the 1910 Integrated Public Use Microdata Series and estimate zero-inflated negative binomial models that simultaneously distinguish those who are infecund (vs. fecund) and estimate the number of remarital births among the fecund. Our approach allows us to evaluate historical remarital (in)fertility differences, accounting for marital, socioeconomic, and geographic influences on fecundity and fertility, while empirically accounting for the influence of children “missing” from the household due to mortality and fostering/aging out. Consistent with past studies that emphasized poorer African American health as a major influence on involuntary infertility, we find that African American women were more likely than white women to be in the always-zero (infecund) group and to have fewer remarital births. Supplemental analyses nuance these findings but indicate that these results are robust. Overall, we find support for a multiple-causes perspective: while the findings are consistent with the adoption of deliberate fertility control among urban and higher-status women at higher parities, remarital fertility differences in 1910 also reflected greater infecundity/subfecundity among subgroups of women, especially African American women.

KW - Health

KW - Historical United States

KW - Infertility

KW - Race

KW - Remarriage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028776636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028776636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13524-017-0607-x

DO - 10.1007/s13524-017-0607-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 28864966

AN - SCOPUS:85028776636

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Demography

JF - Demography

SN - 0070-3370

ER -