Race ignore-ance, colortalk, and white complicity

white is.white isn't

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this review essay, Barbara Applebaum uses white complicity as a framework for discussing three books: Mica Pollock's Colormute: Race Talk Dilemmas in an American School, Debra Van Ausdale and Joe R. Feagin's The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racist, and Virginia Lea and Judy Helfand's Identifying Race and Transforming Whiteness in the Classroom. She explains the notion of white complicity and discusses some of the deep philosophical questions involving moral responsibility and agency that arise when one acknowledges white complicity. In particular, she examines the question of whether complicity is best described as grounded in individual intention or as an outcome of collective action, as well as whether "complicity" as a word displaces the strong sense of harm implied by the term "racist." Finally, Applebaum explores how some of these philosophical questions crisscross through the discussions highlighted in the three books.If you can talk to me in ways that show you understand that your knowledge of me, the world, and "the Right thing to do" will always be partial, interested, and potentially oppressive to others, and if I can do the same, then we can work together on shaping and reshaping alliances for constructing circumstances in which students of difference can thrive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-362
Number of pages18
JournalEducational Theory
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006

Fingerprint

collective behavior
classroom
responsibility
school
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Race ignore-ance, colortalk, and white complicity : white is.white isn't. / Applebaum, Barbara.

In: Educational Theory, Vol. 56, No. 3, 08.2006, p. 345-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a9a929014994a6fada2d0b6227e983a,
title = "Race ignore-ance, colortalk, and white complicity: white is.white isn't",
abstract = "In this review essay, Barbara Applebaum uses white complicity as a framework for discussing three books: Mica Pollock's Colormute: Race Talk Dilemmas in an American School, Debra Van Ausdale and Joe R. Feagin's The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racist, and Virginia Lea and Judy Helfand's Identifying Race and Transforming Whiteness in the Classroom. She explains the notion of white complicity and discusses some of the deep philosophical questions involving moral responsibility and agency that arise when one acknowledges white complicity. In particular, she examines the question of whether complicity is best described as grounded in individual intention or as an outcome of collective action, as well as whether {"}complicity{"} as a word displaces the strong sense of harm implied by the term {"}racist.{"} Finally, Applebaum explores how some of these philosophical questions crisscross through the discussions highlighted in the three books.If you can talk to me in ways that show you understand that your knowledge of me, the world, and {"}the Right thing to do{"} will always be partial, interested, and potentially oppressive to others, and if I can do the same, then we can work together on shaping and reshaping alliances for constructing circumstances in which students of difference can thrive.",
author = "Barbara Applebaum",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00230.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "345--362",
journal = "Educational Theory",
issn = "0013-2004",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race ignore-ance, colortalk, and white complicity

T2 - white is.white isn't

AU - Applebaum, Barbara

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - In this review essay, Barbara Applebaum uses white complicity as a framework for discussing three books: Mica Pollock's Colormute: Race Talk Dilemmas in an American School, Debra Van Ausdale and Joe R. Feagin's The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racist, and Virginia Lea and Judy Helfand's Identifying Race and Transforming Whiteness in the Classroom. She explains the notion of white complicity and discusses some of the deep philosophical questions involving moral responsibility and agency that arise when one acknowledges white complicity. In particular, she examines the question of whether complicity is best described as grounded in individual intention or as an outcome of collective action, as well as whether "complicity" as a word displaces the strong sense of harm implied by the term "racist." Finally, Applebaum explores how some of these philosophical questions crisscross through the discussions highlighted in the three books.If you can talk to me in ways that show you understand that your knowledge of me, the world, and "the Right thing to do" will always be partial, interested, and potentially oppressive to others, and if I can do the same, then we can work together on shaping and reshaping alliances for constructing circumstances in which students of difference can thrive.

AB - In this review essay, Barbara Applebaum uses white complicity as a framework for discussing three books: Mica Pollock's Colormute: Race Talk Dilemmas in an American School, Debra Van Ausdale and Joe R. Feagin's The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racist, and Virginia Lea and Judy Helfand's Identifying Race and Transforming Whiteness in the Classroom. She explains the notion of white complicity and discusses some of the deep philosophical questions involving moral responsibility and agency that arise when one acknowledges white complicity. In particular, she examines the question of whether complicity is best described as grounded in individual intention or as an outcome of collective action, as well as whether "complicity" as a word displaces the strong sense of harm implied by the term "racist." Finally, Applebaum explores how some of these philosophical questions crisscross through the discussions highlighted in the three books.If you can talk to me in ways that show you understand that your knowledge of me, the world, and "the Right thing to do" will always be partial, interested, and potentially oppressive to others, and if I can do the same, then we can work together on shaping and reshaping alliances for constructing circumstances in which students of difference can thrive.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44549085939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44549085939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00230.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00230.x

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 345

EP - 362

JO - Educational Theory

JF - Educational Theory

SN - 0013-2004

IS - 3

ER -