Race, “Deservingness,” and Social Spending Attitudes: The Role of Policy Delivery Mechanism

Christopher Ellis, Christopher George Faricy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines how the means through which social benefits are delivered—either through a direct government program, or through a tax expenditure program—affects how citizens view social welfare programs and their beneficiaries. Attitudes toward social spending in the United States are strongly conditioned by both racial considerations and perceptions of the deservingness of recipients. We argue that the political cues given by spending conducted through the tax code differ from those given by direct spending in a way that both de-racializes spending attitudes and changes the lens through which citizens evaluate the deservingness of beneficiaries. Through a series of survey experiments, we demonstrate that social benefits delivered through the tax code are less likely to activate racialized thinking than similar or identical benefits delivered directly. This is true, at least in part, because recipients of tax expenditures are perceived as more deserving than recipients of otherwise identical direct spending.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPolitical Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

taxes
recipient
social benefits
expenditures
citizen
government program
social welfare
experiment

Keywords

  • Inequality
  • Public opinion
  • Social policy
  • Social spending
  • Symbolic racism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{02fbef36c04f457c90fc444651db0c36,
title = "Race, “Deservingness,” and Social Spending Attitudes: The Role of Policy Delivery Mechanism",
abstract = "This paper examines how the means through which social benefits are delivered—either through a direct government program, or through a tax expenditure program—affects how citizens view social welfare programs and their beneficiaries. Attitudes toward social spending in the United States are strongly conditioned by both racial considerations and perceptions of the deservingness of recipients. We argue that the political cues given by spending conducted through the tax code differ from those given by direct spending in a way that both de-racializes spending attitudes and changes the lens through which citizens evaluate the deservingness of beneficiaries. Through a series of survey experiments, we demonstrate that social benefits delivered through the tax code are less likely to activate racialized thinking than similar or identical benefits delivered directly. This is true, at least in part, because recipients of tax expenditures are perceived as more deserving than recipients of otherwise identical direct spending.",
keywords = "Inequality, Public opinion, Social policy, Social spending, Symbolic racism",
author = "Christopher Ellis and Faricy, {Christopher George}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11109-018-09521-w",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race, “Deservingness,” and Social Spending Attitudes

T2 - The Role of Policy Delivery Mechanism

AU - Ellis, Christopher

AU - Faricy, Christopher George

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This paper examines how the means through which social benefits are delivered—either through a direct government program, or through a tax expenditure program—affects how citizens view social welfare programs and their beneficiaries. Attitudes toward social spending in the United States are strongly conditioned by both racial considerations and perceptions of the deservingness of recipients. We argue that the political cues given by spending conducted through the tax code differ from those given by direct spending in a way that both de-racializes spending attitudes and changes the lens through which citizens evaluate the deservingness of beneficiaries. Through a series of survey experiments, we demonstrate that social benefits delivered through the tax code are less likely to activate racialized thinking than similar or identical benefits delivered directly. This is true, at least in part, because recipients of tax expenditures are perceived as more deserving than recipients of otherwise identical direct spending.

AB - This paper examines how the means through which social benefits are delivered—either through a direct government program, or through a tax expenditure program—affects how citizens view social welfare programs and their beneficiaries. Attitudes toward social spending in the United States are strongly conditioned by both racial considerations and perceptions of the deservingness of recipients. We argue that the political cues given by spending conducted through the tax code differ from those given by direct spending in a way that both de-racializes spending attitudes and changes the lens through which citizens evaluate the deservingness of beneficiaries. Through a series of survey experiments, we demonstrate that social benefits delivered through the tax code are less likely to activate racialized thinking than similar or identical benefits delivered directly. This is true, at least in part, because recipients of tax expenditures are perceived as more deserving than recipients of otherwise identical direct spending.

KW - Inequality

KW - Public opinion

KW - Social policy

KW - Social spending

KW - Symbolic racism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059872731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059872731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11109-018-09521-w

DO - 10.1007/s11109-018-09521-w

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059872731

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

ER -