Abstract
Previous literature has established the widespread use of frames that contrast athletes' physical (i.e., the "brawn" frame, often used for Black athletes) and mental abilities (i.e., the "brain" frame, often used for White athletes) in mediated sports content, particularly oral commentary, which tends to be more spontaneous in nature. The current study analyzed the presence and salience of brawn and brain frames of Heisman finalists in newspaper articles as a function of reporter race; extending previous research by examining (a) written content and (b) reporter race as an antecedent condition. Results confirm the existence of "brawn" and "brain" biases in written sports content, with no influence of reporter race on these patterns. The lack of influence of reporter race-a finding that contradicts research on oral commentary-suggests an institutional influence on frame use in written sports coverage as a function of the more planned nature of "print" media. © 2014
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 171-191 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Howard Journal of Communications |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Heisman Trophy
- content analysis
- framing theory
- race
- sport
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Strategy and Management