Questioning=thinking

Critical curiosity as the focus of an interior design curriculum redesign

Ruth Westervelt, Matthew Leonard

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

Abstract

John Dewey believed that the process of thinking is questioning (1933). With this, a group of educators tasked with the overhaul of a long established interior design program decided, after much discussion, that the focus of the new curriculum would center on one of the great hallmarks of an educated individual - curiosity. With a stated purpose of preparing students for lifelong learning and success, the curriculum redesign bases itself on the goal of nurturing the inherent curiosity in a student. We proceed from the axiom that to cultivate a student's curiosity is to create an expert learner who, despite a capricious future, can find meaningful ways to stay relevant, and positively impact society. Through research, we found that this approach creates a pathway to other important accessory abilities such as leadership, self-direction, intrinsic motivation, lifelong learning, and of importance to this paper, critical questioning with regard to sustainability. No professor would deny they encourage their students to pursue their curiosity, but in truth, their teaching habits, classroom structure, assessment and feedback procedures could actually impede a student's natural inclination. In this paper, we present a general framework for nurturing curiosity that begins with the professor and their core beliefs about their roll in the learning process. It outlines the pedagogical technique for transforming a traditional studio environment into one where Guided Critical Questioning (GCQ) is at the forefront. And finally, we describe the second-year shared experience called Discussion Lab whereby the Sophomore class is split among faculty members to form small discussion groups that grapple with readings and video relevant to sustainability and design. This It-Takes-A-Village approach to the development of the program's student body supports thoughtful critical questioning through a strategy of formulated prompts from multiple points of view.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-40
Number of pages6
JournalDesign Principles and Practices
Volume5
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Critical Thinking
Curiosity
Curriculum Design
Questioning
Curriculum
Sustainability
Life Long Learning
Habit
Learning Process
Axiom
Intrinsic Motivation
Pathway
Inclination
Prompts
Group Discussion
Teaching
John Dewey
Village
Split
Educators

Keywords

  • Critical thinking
  • Curiosity
  • Curriculum design
  • Design thinking
  • Education
  • Environments
  • Inquiry
  • Interior design
  • Pedagogy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cite this

Questioning=thinking : Critical curiosity as the focus of an interior design curriculum redesign. / Westervelt, Ruth; Leonard, Matthew.

In: Design Principles and Practices, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2011, p. 35-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

@article{3857cfffaa9241dda8c15e8bbe2358c9,
title = "Questioning=thinking: Critical curiosity as the focus of an interior design curriculum redesign",
abstract = "John Dewey believed that the process of thinking is questioning (1933). With this, a group of educators tasked with the overhaul of a long established interior design program decided, after much discussion, that the focus of the new curriculum would center on one of the great hallmarks of an educated individual - curiosity. With a stated purpose of preparing students for lifelong learning and success, the curriculum redesign bases itself on the goal of nurturing the inherent curiosity in a student. We proceed from the axiom that to cultivate a student's curiosity is to create an expert learner who, despite a capricious future, can find meaningful ways to stay relevant, and positively impact society. Through research, we found that this approach creates a pathway to other important accessory abilities such as leadership, self-direction, intrinsic motivation, lifelong learning, and of importance to this paper, critical questioning with regard to sustainability. No professor would deny they encourage their students to pursue their curiosity, but in truth, their teaching habits, classroom structure, assessment and feedback procedures could actually impede a student's natural inclination. In this paper, we present a general framework for nurturing curiosity that begins with the professor and their core beliefs about their roll in the learning process. It outlines the pedagogical technique for transforming a traditional studio environment into one where Guided Critical Questioning (GCQ) is at the forefront. And finally, we describe the second-year shared experience called Discussion Lab whereby the Sophomore class is split among faculty members to form small discussion groups that grapple with readings and video relevant to sustainability and design. This It-Takes-A-Village approach to the development of the program's student body supports thoughtful critical questioning through a strategy of formulated prompts from multiple points of view.",
keywords = "Critical thinking, Curiosity, Curriculum design, Design thinking, Education, Environments, Inquiry, Interior design, Pedagogy",
author = "Ruth Westervelt and Matthew Leonard",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "35--40",
journal = "Design Principles and Practices",
issn = "1833-1874",
publisher = "Common Ground Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Questioning=thinking

T2 - Critical curiosity as the focus of an interior design curriculum redesign

AU - Westervelt, Ruth

AU - Leonard, Matthew

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - John Dewey believed that the process of thinking is questioning (1933). With this, a group of educators tasked with the overhaul of a long established interior design program decided, after much discussion, that the focus of the new curriculum would center on one of the great hallmarks of an educated individual - curiosity. With a stated purpose of preparing students for lifelong learning and success, the curriculum redesign bases itself on the goal of nurturing the inherent curiosity in a student. We proceed from the axiom that to cultivate a student's curiosity is to create an expert learner who, despite a capricious future, can find meaningful ways to stay relevant, and positively impact society. Through research, we found that this approach creates a pathway to other important accessory abilities such as leadership, self-direction, intrinsic motivation, lifelong learning, and of importance to this paper, critical questioning with regard to sustainability. No professor would deny they encourage their students to pursue their curiosity, but in truth, their teaching habits, classroom structure, assessment and feedback procedures could actually impede a student's natural inclination. In this paper, we present a general framework for nurturing curiosity that begins with the professor and their core beliefs about their roll in the learning process. It outlines the pedagogical technique for transforming a traditional studio environment into one where Guided Critical Questioning (GCQ) is at the forefront. And finally, we describe the second-year shared experience called Discussion Lab whereby the Sophomore class is split among faculty members to form small discussion groups that grapple with readings and video relevant to sustainability and design. This It-Takes-A-Village approach to the development of the program's student body supports thoughtful critical questioning through a strategy of formulated prompts from multiple points of view.

AB - John Dewey believed that the process of thinking is questioning (1933). With this, a group of educators tasked with the overhaul of a long established interior design program decided, after much discussion, that the focus of the new curriculum would center on one of the great hallmarks of an educated individual - curiosity. With a stated purpose of preparing students for lifelong learning and success, the curriculum redesign bases itself on the goal of nurturing the inherent curiosity in a student. We proceed from the axiom that to cultivate a student's curiosity is to create an expert learner who, despite a capricious future, can find meaningful ways to stay relevant, and positively impact society. Through research, we found that this approach creates a pathway to other important accessory abilities such as leadership, self-direction, intrinsic motivation, lifelong learning, and of importance to this paper, critical questioning with regard to sustainability. No professor would deny they encourage their students to pursue their curiosity, but in truth, their teaching habits, classroom structure, assessment and feedback procedures could actually impede a student's natural inclination. In this paper, we present a general framework for nurturing curiosity that begins with the professor and their core beliefs about their roll in the learning process. It outlines the pedagogical technique for transforming a traditional studio environment into one where Guided Critical Questioning (GCQ) is at the forefront. And finally, we describe the second-year shared experience called Discussion Lab whereby the Sophomore class is split among faculty members to form small discussion groups that grapple with readings and video relevant to sustainability and design. This It-Takes-A-Village approach to the development of the program's student body supports thoughtful critical questioning through a strategy of formulated prompts from multiple points of view.

KW - Critical thinking

KW - Curiosity

KW - Curriculum design

KW - Design thinking

KW - Education

KW - Environments

KW - Inquiry

KW - Interior design

KW - Pedagogy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859168263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859168263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Short survey

VL - 5

SP - 35

EP - 40

JO - Design Principles and Practices

JF - Design Principles and Practices

SN - 1833-1874

IS - 4

ER -