Quantifying Political Relationships

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article, I introduce a method that uses large-scale event data and latent factor network models to provide a new comparative measure of cooperation and conflict in public relationships among politicians, nonpartisan political actors, and societal actors. The approach has a number of advantages over existing techniques: It captures public relationships in a multitude of venues on a continuous basis, incorporates both partisan and nonpartisan actors, allows quantifying the relationship between any pair of actors, reflects that communication is not unidirectional but rather a back and forth, and can be applied to a large number of countries over time. I apply the method to 13 Western European countries from 2001 to 2014 and demonstrate that party relationships are determined by coalition status as well as policy differences. The measure is publicly available and can be incorporated into standard research designs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

political actor
research planning
politician
coalition
event
communication
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Quantifying Political Relationships. / Weschle, Simon.

In: American Political Science Review, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ea1046dd9dc4002a8c226f7116e9da8,
title = "Quantifying Political Relationships",
abstract = "In this article, I introduce a method that uses large-scale event data and latent factor network models to provide a new comparative measure of cooperation and conflict in public relationships among politicians, nonpartisan political actors, and societal actors. The approach has a number of advantages over existing techniques: It captures public relationships in a multitude of venues on a continuous basis, incorporates both partisan and nonpartisan actors, allows quantifying the relationship between any pair of actors, reflects that communication is not unidirectional but rather a back and forth, and can be applied to a large number of countries over time. I apply the method to 13 Western European countries from 2001 to 2014 and demonstrate that party relationships are determined by coalition status as well as policy differences. The measure is publicly available and can be incorporated into standard research designs.",
author = "Simon Weschle",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0003055418000461",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying Political Relationships

AU - Weschle, Simon

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In this article, I introduce a method that uses large-scale event data and latent factor network models to provide a new comparative measure of cooperation and conflict in public relationships among politicians, nonpartisan political actors, and societal actors. The approach has a number of advantages over existing techniques: It captures public relationships in a multitude of venues on a continuous basis, incorporates both partisan and nonpartisan actors, allows quantifying the relationship between any pair of actors, reflects that communication is not unidirectional but rather a back and forth, and can be applied to a large number of countries over time. I apply the method to 13 Western European countries from 2001 to 2014 and demonstrate that party relationships are determined by coalition status as well as policy differences. The measure is publicly available and can be incorporated into standard research designs.

AB - In this article, I introduce a method that uses large-scale event data and latent factor network models to provide a new comparative measure of cooperation and conflict in public relationships among politicians, nonpartisan political actors, and societal actors. The approach has a number of advantages over existing techniques: It captures public relationships in a multitude of venues on a continuous basis, incorporates both partisan and nonpartisan actors, allows quantifying the relationship between any pair of actors, reflects that communication is not unidirectional but rather a back and forth, and can be applied to a large number of countries over time. I apply the method to 13 Western European countries from 2001 to 2014 and demonstrate that party relationships are determined by coalition status as well as policy differences. The measure is publicly available and can be incorporated into standard research designs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052927961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052927961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0003055418000461

DO - 10.1017/S0003055418000461

M3 - Article

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

ER -