Publicly traded versus privately held: Implications for conditional conservatism in bank accounting

D. Craig Nichols, James M. Wahlen, Matthew M. Wieland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Scopus citations

Abstract

Compared with privately held banks, publicly traded banks face greater agency costs because of greater separation of ownership and control but enjoy greater benefits from access to the equity capital market. Differences in control and capital market access influence public versus private banks' accounting. We predict and find that public banks exhibit greater degrees of conditional conservatism (asymmetric timeliness of the recognition of losses versus gains in accounting income) than private banks. We predict and find that public banks recognize more timely earnings declines, less timely earnings increases, and larger and more timely loan losses. Although public ownership gives managers greater ability and incentive to exercise income-increasing accounting, our findings show that the demand for conservatism dominates within public banks and that the demand for conservatism is greater among public banks than private banks. Our results provide insights for accounting and finance academics, bank managers, auditors, and regulators concerning the effects of ownership structure on conditional conservatism in banks' financial reporting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)88-122
Number of pages35
JournalReview of Accounting Studies
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Agency costs
  • Asymmetric timeliness
  • Conservatism
  • Control
  • Private and public banks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Publicly traded versus privately held: Implications for conditional conservatism in bank accounting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this