Public policy and obstacles to the virtual agora

Insights from the deliberative e-rulemaking project

Peter Muhlberger, Jennifer Stromer-Galley, Nick Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cyber-optimists anticipate that electronic media will serve as an extensive public space, a virtual agora, that will re-engage the public with politics and the policies that affect everyday life. For three years we were involved in a U.S. National Science Foundation funded project designed to enhance the participation of citizens in government agency rulemaking processes using online public deliberation and Natural Language Processing technologies. Despite a promising approach in an important arena for direct and regular public engagement, the project was met with serious obstacles in trying to secure a partnership with a government agency or interest groups. This led us to consider the policy process literature for insights regarding the obstacles we faced. That literature, a mainstay in the public policy and public administration curriculum in the U.S. and an attempt to capture how policy makers actually make decisions, heavily focuses on institutional actors and their adversarial relationships. Yet, it provides for hardly any role for the public to participate in what ideally should be a democratic process. Important components of the literature imply that institutional actors should discourage direct public engagement. The analysis seeks to clarify leverage points and contexts that could be used to promote online public engagement as a regular component of government processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-214
Number of pages18
JournalInformation Polity
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public administration
Curricula
public policy
Processing
government agency
electronic media
public space
deliberation
interest group
public administration
everyday life
citizen
curriculum
participation
politics
language
science
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Communication
  • Information Systems
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Public policy and obstacles to the virtual agora : Insights from the deliberative e-rulemaking project. / Muhlberger, Peter; Stromer-Galley, Jennifer; Webb, Nick.

In: Information Polity, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2011, p. 197-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f265cd9775b24a6196e00c01b53d6f13,
title = "Public policy and obstacles to the virtual agora: Insights from the deliberative e-rulemaking project",
abstract = "Cyber-optimists anticipate that electronic media will serve as an extensive public space, a virtual agora, that will re-engage the public with politics and the policies that affect everyday life. For three years we were involved in a U.S. National Science Foundation funded project designed to enhance the participation of citizens in government agency rulemaking processes using online public deliberation and Natural Language Processing technologies. Despite a promising approach in an important arena for direct and regular public engagement, the project was met with serious obstacles in trying to secure a partnership with a government agency or interest groups. This led us to consider the policy process literature for insights regarding the obstacles we faced. That literature, a mainstay in the public policy and public administration curriculum in the U.S. and an attempt to capture how policy makers actually make decisions, heavily focuses on institutional actors and their adversarial relationships. Yet, it provides for hardly any role for the public to participate in what ideally should be a democratic process. Important components of the literature imply that institutional actors should discourage direct public engagement. The analysis seeks to clarify leverage points and contexts that could be used to promote online public engagement as a regular component of government processes.",
author = "Peter Muhlberger and Jennifer Stromer-Galley and Nick Webb",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3233/IP-2011-0235",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "197--214",
journal = "Information Polity",
issn = "1570-1255",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public policy and obstacles to the virtual agora

T2 - Insights from the deliberative e-rulemaking project

AU - Muhlberger, Peter

AU - Stromer-Galley, Jennifer

AU - Webb, Nick

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Cyber-optimists anticipate that electronic media will serve as an extensive public space, a virtual agora, that will re-engage the public with politics and the policies that affect everyday life. For three years we were involved in a U.S. National Science Foundation funded project designed to enhance the participation of citizens in government agency rulemaking processes using online public deliberation and Natural Language Processing technologies. Despite a promising approach in an important arena for direct and regular public engagement, the project was met with serious obstacles in trying to secure a partnership with a government agency or interest groups. This led us to consider the policy process literature for insights regarding the obstacles we faced. That literature, a mainstay in the public policy and public administration curriculum in the U.S. and an attempt to capture how policy makers actually make decisions, heavily focuses on institutional actors and their adversarial relationships. Yet, it provides for hardly any role for the public to participate in what ideally should be a democratic process. Important components of the literature imply that institutional actors should discourage direct public engagement. The analysis seeks to clarify leverage points and contexts that could be used to promote online public engagement as a regular component of government processes.

AB - Cyber-optimists anticipate that electronic media will serve as an extensive public space, a virtual agora, that will re-engage the public with politics and the policies that affect everyday life. For three years we were involved in a U.S. National Science Foundation funded project designed to enhance the participation of citizens in government agency rulemaking processes using online public deliberation and Natural Language Processing technologies. Despite a promising approach in an important arena for direct and regular public engagement, the project was met with serious obstacles in trying to secure a partnership with a government agency or interest groups. This led us to consider the policy process literature for insights regarding the obstacles we faced. That literature, a mainstay in the public policy and public administration curriculum in the U.S. and an attempt to capture how policy makers actually make decisions, heavily focuses on institutional actors and their adversarial relationships. Yet, it provides for hardly any role for the public to participate in what ideally should be a democratic process. Important components of the literature imply that institutional actors should discourage direct public engagement. The analysis seeks to clarify leverage points and contexts that could be used to promote online public engagement as a regular component of government processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887000445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887000445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/IP-2011-0235

DO - 10.3233/IP-2011-0235

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 197

EP - 214

JO - Information Polity

JF - Information Polity

SN - 1570-1255

IS - 3

ER -