TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychological processes in perceiving reality
AU - Shapiro, Michael A.
AU - Makana Chock, T.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by the Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, Hatch project (NYC–131407), USDA. The authors would like to thank David Roskos-Ewoldsen and the anonymous reviewers for their help, patience, and insightful comments.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Little attention has been paid to the mental processes and the story elements that influence perceived reality judgments of media stories. People often lack the motivation or ability to be thoughtful about perceived reality judgments. This is particularly true when the stimulus controls the pace of the story (e.g., television). It is possible that people use the typical and atypical elements of a story as a heuristic for making simple judgments about perceived reality of media narratives. In 2 studies, the careful manipulation of atypical and typical information in a soap opera and a news story predicted about half the variance in perceived reality. As the typicality of the stories increased, so did the participants' ratings of the perceived reality of the stories. In a 3rd study, while viewing entertainment television shows, participants used dials to continuously rate the selected programs for perceived reality, typicality, interest, and liking. Results indicate that viewers can make moment-to-moment reality judgments, and these judgments are strongly related to typicality. Interest - liking was related to typicality and perceived reality for drama. For comedy, however, situations with low reality produced greater interest and liking. Typicality appears to be a key psychological characteristic of media stories.
AB - Little attention has been paid to the mental processes and the story elements that influence perceived reality judgments of media stories. People often lack the motivation or ability to be thoughtful about perceived reality judgments. This is particularly true when the stimulus controls the pace of the story (e.g., television). It is possible that people use the typical and atypical elements of a story as a heuristic for making simple judgments about perceived reality of media narratives. In 2 studies, the careful manipulation of atypical and typical information in a soap opera and a news story predicted about half the variance in perceived reality. As the typicality of the stories increased, so did the participants' ratings of the perceived reality of the stories. In a 3rd study, while viewing entertainment television shows, participants used dials to continuously rate the selected programs for perceived reality, typicality, interest, and liking. Results indicate that viewers can make moment-to-moment reality judgments, and these judgments are strongly related to typicality. Interest - liking was related to typicality and perceived reality for drama. For comedy, however, situations with low reality produced greater interest and liking. Typicality appears to be a key psychological characteristic of media stories.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037767123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037767123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0502_3
DO - 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0502_3
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0037767123
SN - 1521-3269
VL - 5
SP - 163
EP - 198
JO - Media Psychology
JF - Media Psychology
IS - 2
ER -