Protective behavioral strategies for reducing alcohol involvement: A review of the methodological issues

Mark A. Prince, Kate B. Carey, Stephen A. Maisto

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Alcohol use among college students remains a major public health concern with many students experiencing negative alcohol-related consequences as a result of their drinking. Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) have been conceptualized as skills used by drinkers to moderate their drinking and/or resulting consequences. The correlational evidence for the relationships among PBS, alcohol use, and related problems has been mixed. Experimental research reveals inconsistent relationships among intervention condition, PBS use, and alcohol outcomes. There is currently insufficient evidence to support the claim that PBS function as a mechanism of behavior change for college drinkers. We propose that the inconsistencies found in the correlational and experimental research are explained in part by psychometric and methodological issues. This review summarizes measurement and methodological issues in studies that have directly assessed the relationship between PBS and alcohol use and/or alcohol-related consequences in college drinking samples. Additionally, we provide some suggestions and future directions to overcome methodological and conceptual limitations and to advance understanding of the role of protective behavioral strategy use in reducing alcohol involvement among college drinkers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2343-2351
Number of pages9
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume38
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • College students
  • Protective behavioral strategies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Toxicology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Protective behavioral strategies for reducing alcohol involvement: A review of the methodological issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this