Project RAILS: Lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills

Jackie Belanger, Ning Zou, Jenny Rushing Mills, Claire Holmes, Megan Oakleaf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

Rubric assessment of information literacy is an important tool for librarians seeking to show evidence of student learning. The authors, who collaborated on the Rubric Assessment of Informational Literacy Skills (RAILS) research project, draw from their shared experience to present practical recommendations for implementing rubric assessment in a variety of institutional contexts. These recommendations focus on four areas: (1) building successful collaborative relationships, (2) developing assignments, (3) creating and using rubrics, and (4) using assessment results to improve instruction and assessment practices. Recommendations are discussed in detail and include institutional examples of emerging practices that can be adapted for local use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)623-644
Number of pages22
JournalPortal
Volume15
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

literacy
project assessment
student
learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development

Cite this

Belanger, J., Zou, N., Mills, J. R., Holmes, C., & Oakleaf, M. (2015). Project RAILS: Lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills. Portal, 15(4), 623-644.

Project RAILS : Lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills. / Belanger, Jackie; Zou, Ning; Mills, Jenny Rushing; Holmes, Claire; Oakleaf, Megan.

In: Portal, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 623-644.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Belanger, J, Zou, N, Mills, JR, Holmes, C & Oakleaf, M 2015, 'Project RAILS: Lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills' Portal, vol 15, no. 4, pp. 623-644.
Belanger J, Zou N, Mills JR, Holmes C, Oakleaf M. Project RAILS: Lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills. Portal. 2015 Oct 1;15(4):623-644.

Belanger, Jackie; Zou, Ning; Mills, Jenny Rushing; Holmes, Claire; Oakleaf, Megan / Project RAILS : Lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills.

In: Portal, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 623-644.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07e5a867bf484b5fa9063e1ba555fbed,
title = "Project RAILS: Lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills",
author = "Jackie Belanger and Ning Zou and Mills, {Jenny Rushing} and Claire Holmes and Megan Oakleaf",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
volume = "15",
pages = "623--644",
journal = "Portal: Libraries and the Academy",
issn = "1531-2542",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Project RAILS

T2 - Portal: Libraries and the Academy

AU - Belanger,Jackie

AU - Zou,Ning

AU - Mills,Jenny Rushing

AU - Holmes,Claire

AU - Oakleaf,Megan

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Rubric assessment of information literacy is an important tool for librarians seeking to show evidence of student learning. The authors, who collaborated on the Rubric Assessment of Informational Literacy Skills (RAILS) research project, draw from their shared experience to present practical recommendations for implementing rubric assessment in a variety of institutional contexts. These recommendations focus on four areas: (1) building successful collaborative relationships, (2) developing assignments, (3) creating and using rubrics, and (4) using assessment results to improve instruction and assessment practices. Recommendations are discussed in detail and include institutional examples of emerging practices that can be adapted for local use.

AB - Rubric assessment of information literacy is an important tool for librarians seeking to show evidence of student learning. The authors, who collaborated on the Rubric Assessment of Informational Literacy Skills (RAILS) research project, draw from their shared experience to present practical recommendations for implementing rubric assessment in a variety of institutional contexts. These recommendations focus on four areas: (1) building successful collaborative relationships, (2) developing assignments, (3) creating and using rubrics, and (4) using assessment results to improve instruction and assessment practices. Recommendations are discussed in detail and include institutional examples of emerging practices that can be adapted for local use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943599797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943599797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 623

EP - 644

JO - Portal: Libraries and the Academy

JF - Portal: Libraries and the Academy

SN - 1531-2542

IS - 4

ER -