TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting performance on a 3rd grade high-stakes reading assessment
AU - Conradi Smith, Kristin
AU - Amendum, Steven J.
AU - Jang, Bong Gee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2020/7/3
Y1 - 2020/7/3
N2 - In this study, we investigated the predictive value of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) measures for performance on a high-stakes reading assessment at the end of third grade. DIBELS measures were administered to students at the end of third grade, around the same time as their high-stakes tests. Collectively, the measures succeeded in predicting 88.7% of those who would pass the high-stakes test, but only 68.8% of those who did not pass. Importantly, rate, alone, predicted 88.3% of those who would pass and 67.7% of those who did not pass. Multiple regression analyses were next used to test how well the subscales of DIBELS Next predicted students’ scores on Reading Comprehension Achievement Test (RCAT) in both the pass and fail groups. Also, for practical purposes, we examined both the scores and characteristics of students for whom the logistic regression failed to predicted performance. Implications for instruction, assessment, and future research are discussed.
AB - In this study, we investigated the predictive value of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) measures for performance on a high-stakes reading assessment at the end of third grade. DIBELS measures were administered to students at the end of third grade, around the same time as their high-stakes tests. Collectively, the measures succeeded in predicting 88.7% of those who would pass the high-stakes test, but only 68.8% of those who did not pass. Importantly, rate, alone, predicted 88.3% of those who would pass and 67.7% of those who did not pass. Multiple regression analyses were next used to test how well the subscales of DIBELS Next predicted students’ scores on Reading Comprehension Achievement Test (RCAT) in both the pass and fail groups. Also, for practical purposes, we examined both the scores and characteristics of students for whom the logistic regression failed to predicted performance. Implications for instruction, assessment, and future research are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072092766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072092766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10573569.2019.1649612
DO - 10.1080/10573569.2019.1649612
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85072092766
SN - 1057-3569
VL - 36
SP - 365
EP - 378
JO - Reading and Writing Quarterly
JF - Reading and Writing Quarterly
IS - 4
ER -