Post-triumphalist geopolitics: Liberal Selves, authoritarian others

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines a dominant vision in contemporary geopolitics, in which the world is imagined as divided between liberal and illiberal political systems, clustering around the two conceptual nodes of "democracy" and "authoritarianism". It considers how these conceptual nodes are imagined, mapped, and brought to life through writing, policies, and institutions related to democracy promotion. Instead of focusing on the definition of these concepts, this essay scrutinizes the ideological underpinnings of efforts to define "authoritarianism" and "democracy", and shows how these definitional debates themselves produce geopolitical imaginaries that facilitate certain kinds of intervention in an era of "post-triumphalist geopolitics".

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)909-924
Number of pages16
JournalACME
Volume18
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

geopolitics
democracy
authoritarianism
political system
promotion

Keywords

  • Authoritarianism
  • Critical geopolitics
  • Democratization
  • Liberalism
  • Mental maps
  • Orientalism
  • Political geography
  • Post-Soviet space

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Post-triumphalist geopolitics : Liberal Selves, authoritarian others. / Koch, Natalie.

In: ACME, Vol. 18, No. 4, 01.01.2019, p. 909-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{961b88256c5c45afacc0516e9ae4c397,
title = "Post-triumphalist geopolitics: Liberal Selves, authoritarian others",
abstract = "This article examines a dominant vision in contemporary geopolitics, in which the world is imagined as divided between liberal and illiberal political systems, clustering around the two conceptual nodes of {"}democracy{"} and {"}authoritarianism{"}. It considers how these conceptual nodes are imagined, mapped, and brought to life through writing, policies, and institutions related to democracy promotion. Instead of focusing on the definition of these concepts, this essay scrutinizes the ideological underpinnings of efforts to define {"}authoritarianism{"} and {"}democracy{"}, and shows how these definitional debates themselves produce geopolitical imaginaries that facilitate certain kinds of intervention in an era of {"}post-triumphalist geopolitics{"}.",
keywords = "Authoritarianism, Critical geopolitics, Democratization, Liberalism, Mental maps, Orientalism, Political geography, Post-Soviet space",
author = "Natalie Koch",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "909--924",
journal = "ACME",
issn = "1492-9732",
publisher = "Okanagan University College",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post-triumphalist geopolitics

T2 - Liberal Selves, authoritarian others

AU - Koch, Natalie

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This article examines a dominant vision in contemporary geopolitics, in which the world is imagined as divided between liberal and illiberal political systems, clustering around the two conceptual nodes of "democracy" and "authoritarianism". It considers how these conceptual nodes are imagined, mapped, and brought to life through writing, policies, and institutions related to democracy promotion. Instead of focusing on the definition of these concepts, this essay scrutinizes the ideological underpinnings of efforts to define "authoritarianism" and "democracy", and shows how these definitional debates themselves produce geopolitical imaginaries that facilitate certain kinds of intervention in an era of "post-triumphalist geopolitics".

AB - This article examines a dominant vision in contemporary geopolitics, in which the world is imagined as divided between liberal and illiberal political systems, clustering around the two conceptual nodes of "democracy" and "authoritarianism". It considers how these conceptual nodes are imagined, mapped, and brought to life through writing, policies, and institutions related to democracy promotion. Instead of focusing on the definition of these concepts, this essay scrutinizes the ideological underpinnings of efforts to define "authoritarianism" and "democracy", and shows how these definitional debates themselves produce geopolitical imaginaries that facilitate certain kinds of intervention in an era of "post-triumphalist geopolitics".

KW - Authoritarianism

KW - Critical geopolitics

KW - Democratization

KW - Liberalism

KW - Mental maps

KW - Orientalism

KW - Political geography

KW - Post-Soviet space

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072551938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072551938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072551938

VL - 18

SP - 909

EP - 924

JO - ACME

JF - ACME

SN - 1492-9732

IS - 4

ER -