TY - JOUR
T1 - Polymorphic borders
AU - Burridge, Andrew
AU - Gill, Nick
AU - Kocher, Austin
AU - Martin, Lauren
N1 - Funding Information:
Andrew Burridge and Nick Gill acknowledge the support of the Economic and Social Research Council [grant number ES/J023426/1]. Lauren Martin was supported by Suomen Akatemia Postdoctoral Research [grant number 268596].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Regional Studies Association.
PY - 2017/7/3
Y1 - 2017/7/3
N2 - Polymorphic borders. Territory, Politics, Governance. Conceptualizing the respatialization, rescaling and mobilization of border work is a central problem in current borders research. Traditional and ubiquitous border concepts imply a coherent state power belied by much contemporary research. In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Polyphorphic Borders’ we suggest that not only do empirical studies of border work reveal a much more fragmented and chaotic world of bordering that is more guided by site- and agent-specific contingencies than by grand schemes, but also that representing borders as ubiquitous calls forth the state as coherent, monstrous, omnipotent and omniscient. Rather than being either strictly tied to the territorial margins of the states or ubiquitous throughout the entire territory of states, bordering takes on a variety of forms, agents, sites, practices and targets. We propose reconceptualizing borders as polymorphic, or taking on a multiplicity of mutually non-exclusive forms at the same time. In this introduction we propose the metaphor of polymorphic borders in order to account for the respatialization of border work beyond and within traditional borders in a way that avoids viewing borders as either lines, or everywhere. The articles that follow elaborate polymorphic borders through ethnographic investigations of border work at various sites and scales.
AB - Polymorphic borders. Territory, Politics, Governance. Conceptualizing the respatialization, rescaling and mobilization of border work is a central problem in current borders research. Traditional and ubiquitous border concepts imply a coherent state power belied by much contemporary research. In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Polyphorphic Borders’ we suggest that not only do empirical studies of border work reveal a much more fragmented and chaotic world of bordering that is more guided by site- and agent-specific contingencies than by grand schemes, but also that representing borders as ubiquitous calls forth the state as coherent, monstrous, omnipotent and omniscient. Rather than being either strictly tied to the territorial margins of the states or ubiquitous throughout the entire territory of states, bordering takes on a variety of forms, agents, sites, practices and targets. We propose reconceptualizing borders as polymorphic, or taking on a multiplicity of mutually non-exclusive forms at the same time. In this introduction we propose the metaphor of polymorphic borders in order to account for the respatialization of border work beyond and within traditional borders in a way that avoids viewing borders as either lines, or everywhere. The articles that follow elaborate polymorphic borders through ethnographic investigations of border work at various sites and scales.
KW - borders
KW - care
KW - control
KW - enforcement
KW - externalization
KW - immobility
KW - migration
KW - refugees
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016125060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016125060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21622671.2017.1297253
DO - 10.1080/21622671.2017.1297253
M3 - Editorial
AN - SCOPUS:85016125060
SN - 2162-2671
VL - 5
SP - 239
EP - 251
JO - Territory, Politics, Governance
JF - Territory, Politics, Governance
IS - 3
ER -