Political affinity and investors' response to the acquisition premium in cross-border M&A transactions — A moderation analysis

Christian Fieberg, Kerstin Lopatta, Thomas Tammen, Sebastian A. Tideman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article investigates the moderating effect of political affinity between countries on investors' reactions to the premium in cross-border acquisitions (CBAs). Based on a sample of 1,183 CBAs between 1999 and 2018, we find that political affinity positively moderates the relationship between the acquisition premium and the acquiring and target firms' stock market return. We argue that investors use political affinity to assess the reliability of the premium (i.e., management's overall perception of a given deal's synergistic potential). This is in line with prior literature reasoning that, unlike strong political affinity, weak political affinity increases the likelihood of government intervention, decreases the likelihood of deal completion, and results in higher premiums to mitigate the previous effects, thus potentially increasing the likelihood of value destruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2477-2492
Number of pages16
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume42
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • acquisition premium
  • cross-border mergers and acquisitions
  • investor reaction
  • moderation analysis
  • political affinity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Political affinity and investors' response to the acquisition premium in cross-border M&A transactions — A moderation analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this