Abstract
How does a nation formulate policy for a technology not yet quite "ready" but which may nevertheless have to be used? Earthquake prediction illustrates some of the policy issues relevant to this question. Earthquake prediction is a technology that is still in the research and development (R & D) stage. Yet predictions have been made and can be expected in the future. The question for policymakers is, are the predictions "ready enough" to use - do the risks of doing nothing in response to a scientific prediction exceed those of a false alarm? As earthquake prediction represents an emerging technology, it calls for a developing policy framework. What is the nature of "present" developing policy? How did this policy come to be? How adequate is it? What needs to be done? This article attempts to answer such questions, dealing primarily with U.S. policy, but also drawing on the experience of other nations, particularly Japan.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 227-240 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Policy Sciences |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1985 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Social Sciences
- Public Administration
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law