Pluralizing methodologies in the field of LD: From "what works" to what matters

Beth A Ferri, Deborah Gallagher, David J. Connor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The field of learning disabilities (LD) has a complex and complicated history. Tensions over definitions, eligibility criteria, service delivery models, and best practices, as well as epistemological debates, have been a part of that history from its inception. Given our collective struggles, as well as the current realities facing the field, there could not be a more critical moment for a conversation about how it is that we go about knowing what we know. In this concluding essay, we consider how, by focusing so intently on what works, we, as a field, may inadvertently lose sight of what matters. In other words, contrary to the push for narrowing what counts as evidence or knowledge, we examine the potential value in opening up the field to a more diverse range of methods for students who struggle academically. We also challenge taken-for-granted assumptions in the push toward evidence- or research-based practice. Finally, we highlight several compelling themes that we take away from the contributors of this special double issue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-231
Number of pages10
JournalLearning Disability Quarterly
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Learning Disorders
learning disability
History
methodology
history
Practice Guidelines
best practice
evidence
conversation
Students
Research
student

Keywords

  • Learning disabilities
  • Research methods
  • SBR
  • Scientifically based research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Pluralizing methodologies in the field of LD : From "what works" to what matters. / Ferri, Beth A; Gallagher, Deborah; Connor, David J.

In: Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 3, 08.2011, p. 222-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferri, Beth A ; Gallagher, Deborah ; Connor, David J. / Pluralizing methodologies in the field of LD : From "what works" to what matters. In: Learning Disability Quarterly. 2011 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 222-231.
@article{85684808256544aa9a41344535729a5e,
title = "Pluralizing methodologies in the field of LD: From {"}what works{"} to what matters",
abstract = "The field of learning disabilities (LD) has a complex and complicated history. Tensions over definitions, eligibility criteria, service delivery models, and best practices, as well as epistemological debates, have been a part of that history from its inception. Given our collective struggles, as well as the current realities facing the field, there could not be a more critical moment for a conversation about how it is that we go about knowing what we know. In this concluding essay, we consider how, by focusing so intently on what works, we, as a field, may inadvertently lose sight of what matters. In other words, contrary to the push for narrowing what counts as evidence or knowledge, we examine the potential value in opening up the field to a more diverse range of methods for students who struggle academically. We also challenge taken-for-granted assumptions in the push toward evidence- or research-based practice. Finally, we highlight several compelling themes that we take away from the contributors of this special double issue.",
keywords = "Learning disabilities, Research methods, SBR, Scientifically based research",
author = "Ferri, {Beth A} and Deborah Gallagher and Connor, {David J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0731948711419276",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "222--231",
journal = "Learning Disability Quarterly",
issn = "0731-9487",
publisher = "Council for Learning Disabilities",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pluralizing methodologies in the field of LD

T2 - From "what works" to what matters

AU - Ferri, Beth A

AU - Gallagher, Deborah

AU - Connor, David J.

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - The field of learning disabilities (LD) has a complex and complicated history. Tensions over definitions, eligibility criteria, service delivery models, and best practices, as well as epistemological debates, have been a part of that history from its inception. Given our collective struggles, as well as the current realities facing the field, there could not be a more critical moment for a conversation about how it is that we go about knowing what we know. In this concluding essay, we consider how, by focusing so intently on what works, we, as a field, may inadvertently lose sight of what matters. In other words, contrary to the push for narrowing what counts as evidence or knowledge, we examine the potential value in opening up the field to a more diverse range of methods for students who struggle academically. We also challenge taken-for-granted assumptions in the push toward evidence- or research-based practice. Finally, we highlight several compelling themes that we take away from the contributors of this special double issue.

AB - The field of learning disabilities (LD) has a complex and complicated history. Tensions over definitions, eligibility criteria, service delivery models, and best practices, as well as epistemological debates, have been a part of that history from its inception. Given our collective struggles, as well as the current realities facing the field, there could not be a more critical moment for a conversation about how it is that we go about knowing what we know. In this concluding essay, we consider how, by focusing so intently on what works, we, as a field, may inadvertently lose sight of what matters. In other words, contrary to the push for narrowing what counts as evidence or knowledge, we examine the potential value in opening up the field to a more diverse range of methods for students who struggle academically. We also challenge taken-for-granted assumptions in the push toward evidence- or research-based practice. Finally, we highlight several compelling themes that we take away from the contributors of this special double issue.

KW - Learning disabilities

KW - Research methods

KW - SBR

KW - Scientifically based research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054888711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054888711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0731948711419276

DO - 10.1177/0731948711419276

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80054888711

VL - 34

SP - 222

EP - 231

JO - Learning Disability Quarterly

JF - Learning Disability Quarterly

SN - 0731-9487

IS - 3

ER -