Plant energetics and the synthesis of population and ecosystem ecology

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Historical conceptual divisions in ecology are dissolving as ecologists seek general currencies for understanding plant function, population dynamics, species interactions and ecosystem processes. Foremost among such synthetic approaches are population-ecosystem models (PEMs), which treat the biomass dynamics of individuals as a foundation for coupled demographic and biogeochemical processes. Because plant productivity and tissue composition drive terrestrial energy and nutrient cycling, and plant growth itself is often used as a fitness proxy, PEMs predict that phenomena related to population dynamics, such as species coexistence, are associated with processes at the ecosystem level. I argue that this line of thought reflects a persistent misunderstanding of the relationship of plant growth—the creation of new structural biomass—and individual fitness. A survey of measured energetic costs of a wide variety of plant functions suggests that the majority of assimilated energy for many plants is allocated to survival rather than growth processes. This diversion of assimilate to survival—such as fighting infection, reducing potential tissue damage, or storing reserves in the face of defoliation risk—contributes to individual fitness but may not impact the flow of energy and nutrients in the environment or to other trophic levels. Synthesis. Using simple models of plant energy budgets, I demonstrate how incorporating survival allocation into PEMs using a bet-hedging approach can decouple population and ecosystem dynamics. In revisiting what little is known about how individual plants use energy, I suggest that recasting plant strategy theory in an energetic-demographic framework may offer a useful way forward in the drive to unify population and ecosystem processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-110
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Ecology
Volume105
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

energetics
ecology
synthesis
ecosystems
ecosystem
population dynamics
energy
fitness
demographic statistics
bet-hedging
energy flow
ecosystem dynamics
ecologists
defoliation
currency
fighting
nutrient cycling
energy budget
biogeochemical cycles
energy use

Keywords

  • demography
  • ecophysiology
  • ecosystem functioning
  • energetics
  • functional traits
  • plant life-history traits
  • plant population and community dynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Plant energetics and the synthesis of population and ecosystem ecology. / Fridley, Jason D.

In: Journal of Ecology, Vol. 105, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 95-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{113f1cebb6a545a18f13b072708196ca,
title = "Plant energetics and the synthesis of population and ecosystem ecology",
abstract = "Historical conceptual divisions in ecology are dissolving as ecologists seek general currencies for understanding plant function, population dynamics, species interactions and ecosystem processes. Foremost among such synthetic approaches are population-ecosystem models (PEMs), which treat the biomass dynamics of individuals as a foundation for coupled demographic and biogeochemical processes. Because plant productivity and tissue composition drive terrestrial energy and nutrient cycling, and plant growth itself is often used as a fitness proxy, PEMs predict that phenomena related to population dynamics, such as species coexistence, are associated with processes at the ecosystem level. I argue that this line of thought reflects a persistent misunderstanding of the relationship of plant growth—the creation of new structural biomass—and individual fitness. A survey of measured energetic costs of a wide variety of plant functions suggests that the majority of assimilated energy for many plants is allocated to survival rather than growth processes. This diversion of assimilate to survival—such as fighting infection, reducing potential tissue damage, or storing reserves in the face of defoliation risk—contributes to individual fitness but may not impact the flow of energy and nutrients in the environment or to other trophic levels. Synthesis. Using simple models of plant energy budgets, I demonstrate how incorporating survival allocation into PEMs using a bet-hedging approach can decouple population and ecosystem dynamics. In revisiting what little is known about how individual plants use energy, I suggest that recasting plant strategy theory in an energetic-demographic framework may offer a useful way forward in the drive to unify population and ecosystem processes.",
keywords = "demography, ecophysiology, ecosystem functioning, energetics, functional traits, plant life-history traits, plant population and community dynamics",
author = "Fridley, {Jason D}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2745.12693",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "95--110",
journal = "Journal of Ecology",
issn = "0022-0477",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plant energetics and the synthesis of population and ecosystem ecology

AU - Fridley, Jason D

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Historical conceptual divisions in ecology are dissolving as ecologists seek general currencies for understanding plant function, population dynamics, species interactions and ecosystem processes. Foremost among such synthetic approaches are population-ecosystem models (PEMs), which treat the biomass dynamics of individuals as a foundation for coupled demographic and biogeochemical processes. Because plant productivity and tissue composition drive terrestrial energy and nutrient cycling, and plant growth itself is often used as a fitness proxy, PEMs predict that phenomena related to population dynamics, such as species coexistence, are associated with processes at the ecosystem level. I argue that this line of thought reflects a persistent misunderstanding of the relationship of plant growth—the creation of new structural biomass—and individual fitness. A survey of measured energetic costs of a wide variety of plant functions suggests that the majority of assimilated energy for many plants is allocated to survival rather than growth processes. This diversion of assimilate to survival—such as fighting infection, reducing potential tissue damage, or storing reserves in the face of defoliation risk—contributes to individual fitness but may not impact the flow of energy and nutrients in the environment or to other trophic levels. Synthesis. Using simple models of plant energy budgets, I demonstrate how incorporating survival allocation into PEMs using a bet-hedging approach can decouple population and ecosystem dynamics. In revisiting what little is known about how individual plants use energy, I suggest that recasting plant strategy theory in an energetic-demographic framework may offer a useful way forward in the drive to unify population and ecosystem processes.

AB - Historical conceptual divisions in ecology are dissolving as ecologists seek general currencies for understanding plant function, population dynamics, species interactions and ecosystem processes. Foremost among such synthetic approaches are population-ecosystem models (PEMs), which treat the biomass dynamics of individuals as a foundation for coupled demographic and biogeochemical processes. Because plant productivity and tissue composition drive terrestrial energy and nutrient cycling, and plant growth itself is often used as a fitness proxy, PEMs predict that phenomena related to population dynamics, such as species coexistence, are associated with processes at the ecosystem level. I argue that this line of thought reflects a persistent misunderstanding of the relationship of plant growth—the creation of new structural biomass—and individual fitness. A survey of measured energetic costs of a wide variety of plant functions suggests that the majority of assimilated energy for many plants is allocated to survival rather than growth processes. This diversion of assimilate to survival—such as fighting infection, reducing potential tissue damage, or storing reserves in the face of defoliation risk—contributes to individual fitness but may not impact the flow of energy and nutrients in the environment or to other trophic levels. Synthesis. Using simple models of plant energy budgets, I demonstrate how incorporating survival allocation into PEMs using a bet-hedging approach can decouple population and ecosystem dynamics. In revisiting what little is known about how individual plants use energy, I suggest that recasting plant strategy theory in an energetic-demographic framework may offer a useful way forward in the drive to unify population and ecosystem processes.

KW - demography

KW - ecophysiology

KW - ecosystem functioning

KW - energetics

KW - functional traits

KW - plant life-history traits

KW - plant population and community dynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006100702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006100702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2745.12693

DO - 10.1111/1365-2745.12693

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85006100702

VL - 105

SP - 95

EP - 110

JO - Journal of Ecology

JF - Journal of Ecology

SN - 0022-0477

IS - 1

ER -