TY - JOUR
T1 - Partial understanding
AU - Abreu Zavaleta, Martín
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Say that an audience understands a given utterance perfectly only if she correctly identifies which proposition (or propositions) that utterance expresses. In ideal circumstances, the participants in a conversation will understand each other’s utterances perfectly; however, even if they do not, they may still understand each other’s utterances at least in part. Although it is plausible to think that the phenomenon of partial understanding is very common, there is currently no philosophical account of it. This paper offers such an account. Along the way, I argue against two seemingly plausible accounts which use Stalnaker’s notion of common ground and Lewisian subject matters, respectively.
AB - Say that an audience understands a given utterance perfectly only if she correctly identifies which proposition (or propositions) that utterance expresses. In ideal circumstances, the participants in a conversation will understand each other’s utterances perfectly; however, even if they do not, they may still understand each other’s utterances at least in part. Although it is plausible to think that the phenomenon of partial understanding is very common, there is currently no philosophical account of it. This paper offers such an account. Along the way, I argue against two seemingly plausible accounts which use Stalnaker’s notion of common ground and Lewisian subject matters, respectively.
KW - Communication
KW - Content parthood
KW - Semantic underdetermination
KW - Truthmaker semantics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165611908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165611908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11229-023-04268-2
DO - 10.1007/s11229-023-04268-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85165611908
SN - 0039-7857
VL - 202
JO - Synthese
JF - Synthese
IS - 2
M1 - 41
ER -