PACES: A physical activity campus environmental supports audit on university campuses

Tanya M. Horacek, Adrienne A. White, Carol Byrd-Bredbenner, Melissa M. Reznar, Melissa D. Olfert, Jesse S. Morrell, Mallory M. Koenings, Onikia N. Brown, Karla P. Shelnutt, Kendra K. Kattelmann, Geoffrey W. Greene, Sarah E. Colby, Carrie A. Thompson-Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose. This study evaluated the policy and built and recreation environmental supports for physical activity on 13 university campuses. Design. Environmental audit survey. Setting. Thirteen U.S. universities, 2009. Subjects. University policies, recreation programs and facilities, and at least five additional buildings per campus. Measures. The Physical Activity Campus Environmental Supports Audit was developed for this study. Analysis. Analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey's B and Χ2 assessed differences by institution and building type. Results. The mean obesogenic policy score was significantly lower than the desired score, ≥7 (p = .002), with only one campus scoring 10. The mean built environment audit score (5.4 ± 1.7) was low, with significant differences between institutions (p <.001) and only three campuses scoring above the desired score, ≥7. Although generally stairwells were clean and well lighted, there was a lack of signage to encourage stair use (p <.001). Overall, recreation programs (7.1 ± .7) and facilities (7.1 ± 1.2) scored well, but amenities scores were lower for satellite (2.8 ± 1.6) versus main (4.1 ± 1.8) recreation facilities (p = .04). Conclusion. On these 13 university campuses, recreation programs and facilities were supportive of healthful lifestyles for obesity prevention, but policies and the built environment were not. This physical activity environmental audit survey requires testing in a wider sample of postsecondary institutions to corroborate its utility and provide evidence to support initiatives to improve campus environments for physical activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e104-e117
JournalAmerican Journal of Health Promotion
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 13 2014

Keywords

  • Audit
  • Built Physical Activity Environment
  • College Campus
  • Health focus: physical activity built environment quality/accessibility
  • Policies
  • Prevention Research. Manuscript format: research
  • Recreation Services Programs and Facilities Obesogenic Policies
  • Recreation services
  • Research purpose:description/evaluation
  • Setting: university/postsecondary campuses
  • Strategy: built environment
  • Study design: survey;Outcomemeasure: physical activity environmental support scores
  • Target population circumstances: size/population of postsecondary campuses
  • Target population: buildings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'PACES: A physical activity campus environmental supports audit on university campuses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Horacek, T. M., White, A. A., Byrd-Bredbenner, C., Reznar, M. M., Olfert, M. D., Morrell, J. S., Koenings, M. M., Brown, O. N., Shelnutt, K. P., Kattelmann, K. K., Greene, G. W., Colby, S. E., & Thompson-Snyder, C. A. (2014). PACES: A physical activity campus environmental supports audit on university campuses. American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(4), e104-e117. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.121212-QUAN-604