Overturning Italy’s Article 18: Exogenous and endogenous pressures, and role of the state

Tod Rutherford, Lorenzo Frangi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 1970 Article 18 provided important employment protection for workers in larger firms in Italy. Its core aspect (i.e. reinstatement in the case of unfair dismissal) was recently overturned by the Jobs Act for employees hired after its approval. To explain Article 18’s abolition, the authors assess the explicative power of (1) stronger exogenous pressures from economic international institutions, and (2) weaker endogenous pressures from unions and business organizations. Documentary analyses and semi-structured interviews with key informants reveal that while these two forces are critical, they tend to ‘read off’ the state policy decision making role, which, the authors argue, is central to explaining the overturning of Article 18.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-457
Number of pages19
JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Decision making
Personnel
Economics
Industry
Role of the state
Structured interview
Employees
Italy
Business organization
International institutions
Employment protection
Large firms
Unfair dismissal
State policy
Workers

Keywords

  • Article 18
  • employment protection legislation
  • Italy
  • Jobs Act
  • trade unions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Overturning Italy’s Article 18 : Exogenous and endogenous pressures, and role of the state. / Rutherford, Tod; Frangi, Lorenzo.

In: Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 39, No. 3, 01.08.2018, p. 439-457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf05c1352b3b4f59895a14400e17eaf5,
title = "Overturning Italy’s Article 18: Exogenous and endogenous pressures, and role of the state",
abstract = "Since 1970 Article 18 provided important employment protection for workers in larger firms in Italy. Its core aspect (i.e. reinstatement in the case of unfair dismissal) was recently overturned by the Jobs Act for employees hired after its approval. To explain Article 18’s abolition, the authors assess the explicative power of (1) stronger exogenous pressures from economic international institutions, and (2) weaker endogenous pressures from unions and business organizations. Documentary analyses and semi-structured interviews with key informants reveal that while these two forces are critical, they tend to ‘read off’ the state policy decision making role, which, the authors argue, is central to explaining the overturning of Article 18.",
keywords = "Article 18, employment protection legislation, Italy, Jobs Act, trade unions",
author = "Tod Rutherford and Lorenzo Frangi",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0143831X16635830",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "439--457",
journal = "Economic and Industrial Democracy",
issn = "0143-831X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overturning Italy’s Article 18

T2 - Exogenous and endogenous pressures, and role of the state

AU - Rutherford, Tod

AU - Frangi, Lorenzo

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Since 1970 Article 18 provided important employment protection for workers in larger firms in Italy. Its core aspect (i.e. reinstatement in the case of unfair dismissal) was recently overturned by the Jobs Act for employees hired after its approval. To explain Article 18’s abolition, the authors assess the explicative power of (1) stronger exogenous pressures from economic international institutions, and (2) weaker endogenous pressures from unions and business organizations. Documentary analyses and semi-structured interviews with key informants reveal that while these two forces are critical, they tend to ‘read off’ the state policy decision making role, which, the authors argue, is central to explaining the overturning of Article 18.

AB - Since 1970 Article 18 provided important employment protection for workers in larger firms in Italy. Its core aspect (i.e. reinstatement in the case of unfair dismissal) was recently overturned by the Jobs Act for employees hired after its approval. To explain Article 18’s abolition, the authors assess the explicative power of (1) stronger exogenous pressures from economic international institutions, and (2) weaker endogenous pressures from unions and business organizations. Documentary analyses and semi-structured interviews with key informants reveal that while these two forces are critical, they tend to ‘read off’ the state policy decision making role, which, the authors argue, is central to explaining the overturning of Article 18.

KW - Article 18

KW - employment protection legislation

KW - Italy

KW - Jobs Act

KW - trade unions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046879867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046879867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0143831X16635830

DO - 10.1177/0143831X16635830

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046879867

VL - 39

SP - 439

EP - 457

JO - Economic and Industrial Democracy

JF - Economic and Industrial Democracy

SN - 0143-831X

IS - 3

ER -