Organizational justice and workplace mediation

A six-factor model

Tina Nabatchi, Lisa Blomgren Bingham, David H. Good

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - This study examines the structure and dimensionality of organizational justice in a workplace mediation setting. It has three purposes: to determine whether the procedural and interpersonal justice factors in the four-factor model of organizational justice can be split, thereby providing support for a six-factor model; to identify how the split factors relate to other factors in the model; and to uncover any differences in employee and supervisor perceptions of organizational justice in workplace mediation. Design/methodology/approach - Confirmatory factor analysis is used to explore the fit of four different models of organizational justice. The paper examines cross factor correlations to assess the strength and relationships among factors and to look for differences between employees and supervisors. Findings - It is found that a six-factor model of organizational justice provides the best fit for the data and that factor relationships differ little for employees and supervisors. Research limitations/implications - This is a field test of REDRESS®, the USPS employment mediation program which uses transformative mediation. The study has important theoretical and research implications for organizational justice and workplace mediation. Practical implications - The study has practical implications for organizational conflict management and dispute system design. Originality/value - Organizational justice has not been adequately explored within the context of workplace mediation. The study is unique in that it concurrently examines multiple factors of organizational justice, using a large, longitudinal dataset from an internationally recognized workplace mediation program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)148-174
Number of pages27
JournalInternational Journal of Conflict Management
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

mediation
workplace
justice
Supervisory personnel
Personnel
employee
Factor analysis
Systems analysis
Organizational justice
Mediation
Work place
conflict management
Factors
factor analysis
methodology
Supervisors
Employees
Values

Keywords

  • Alternative dispute resolution
  • Conflict management
  • Dispute procedures
  • Human resource management
  • Workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Organizational justice and workplace mediation : A six-factor model. / Nabatchi, Tina; Bingham, Lisa Blomgren; Good, David H.

In: International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2007, p. 148-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nabatchi, Tina ; Bingham, Lisa Blomgren ; Good, David H. / Organizational justice and workplace mediation : A six-factor model. In: International Journal of Conflict Management. 2007 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 148-174.
@article{01355b8af54a4736a10278acb4f68e84,
title = "Organizational justice and workplace mediation: A six-factor model",
abstract = "Purpose - This study examines the structure and dimensionality of organizational justice in a workplace mediation setting. It has three purposes: to determine whether the procedural and interpersonal justice factors in the four-factor model of organizational justice can be split, thereby providing support for a six-factor model; to identify how the split factors relate to other factors in the model; and to uncover any differences in employee and supervisor perceptions of organizational justice in workplace mediation. Design/methodology/approach - Confirmatory factor analysis is used to explore the fit of four different models of organizational justice. The paper examines cross factor correlations to assess the strength and relationships among factors and to look for differences between employees and supervisors. Findings - It is found that a six-factor model of organizational justice provides the best fit for the data and that factor relationships differ little for employees and supervisors. Research limitations/implications - This is a field test of REDRESS{\circledR}, the USPS employment mediation program which uses transformative mediation. The study has important theoretical and research implications for organizational justice and workplace mediation. Practical implications - The study has practical implications for organizational conflict management and dispute system design. Originality/value - Organizational justice has not been adequately explored within the context of workplace mediation. The study is unique in that it concurrently examines multiple factors of organizational justice, using a large, longitudinal dataset from an internationally recognized workplace mediation program.",
keywords = "Alternative dispute resolution, Conflict management, Dispute procedures, Human resource management, Workplace",
author = "Tina Nabatchi and Bingham, {Lisa Blomgren} and Good, {David H.}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1108/10444060710759354",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "148--174",
journal = "International Journal of Conflict Management",
issn = "1044-4068",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational justice and workplace mediation

T2 - A six-factor model

AU - Nabatchi, Tina

AU - Bingham, Lisa Blomgren

AU - Good, David H.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Purpose - This study examines the structure and dimensionality of organizational justice in a workplace mediation setting. It has three purposes: to determine whether the procedural and interpersonal justice factors in the four-factor model of organizational justice can be split, thereby providing support for a six-factor model; to identify how the split factors relate to other factors in the model; and to uncover any differences in employee and supervisor perceptions of organizational justice in workplace mediation. Design/methodology/approach - Confirmatory factor analysis is used to explore the fit of four different models of organizational justice. The paper examines cross factor correlations to assess the strength and relationships among factors and to look for differences between employees and supervisors. Findings - It is found that a six-factor model of organizational justice provides the best fit for the data and that factor relationships differ little for employees and supervisors. Research limitations/implications - This is a field test of REDRESS®, the USPS employment mediation program which uses transformative mediation. The study has important theoretical and research implications for organizational justice and workplace mediation. Practical implications - The study has practical implications for organizational conflict management and dispute system design. Originality/value - Organizational justice has not been adequately explored within the context of workplace mediation. The study is unique in that it concurrently examines multiple factors of organizational justice, using a large, longitudinal dataset from an internationally recognized workplace mediation program.

AB - Purpose - This study examines the structure and dimensionality of organizational justice in a workplace mediation setting. It has three purposes: to determine whether the procedural and interpersonal justice factors in the four-factor model of organizational justice can be split, thereby providing support for a six-factor model; to identify how the split factors relate to other factors in the model; and to uncover any differences in employee and supervisor perceptions of organizational justice in workplace mediation. Design/methodology/approach - Confirmatory factor analysis is used to explore the fit of four different models of organizational justice. The paper examines cross factor correlations to assess the strength and relationships among factors and to look for differences between employees and supervisors. Findings - It is found that a six-factor model of organizational justice provides the best fit for the data and that factor relationships differ little for employees and supervisors. Research limitations/implications - This is a field test of REDRESS®, the USPS employment mediation program which uses transformative mediation. The study has important theoretical and research implications for organizational justice and workplace mediation. Practical implications - The study has practical implications for organizational conflict management and dispute system design. Originality/value - Organizational justice has not been adequately explored within the context of workplace mediation. The study is unique in that it concurrently examines multiple factors of organizational justice, using a large, longitudinal dataset from an internationally recognized workplace mediation program.

KW - Alternative dispute resolution

KW - Conflict management

KW - Dispute procedures

KW - Human resource management

KW - Workplace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547411539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547411539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/10444060710759354

DO - 10.1108/10444060710759354

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 148

EP - 174

JO - International Journal of Conflict Management

JF - International Journal of Conflict Management

SN - 1044-4068

IS - 2

ER -