TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal Resource Allocation in Ground Wireless Networks Supporting Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Transmissions
AU - Hu, Yulin
AU - Sun, Guodong
AU - Zhang, Guohua
AU - Gursoy, M. Cenk
AU - Schmeink, Anke
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received January 19, 2020; accepted May 5, 2020. Date of publication June 1, 2020; date of current version August 13, 2020. This work was supported by the DFG research under Grant SCHM 2643/16. The review of this article was coordinated by Dr. F. Tang. (Corresponding author: Yulin Hu.) Yulin Hu, Guodong Sun, and Anke Schmeink are with the ISEK Research Are-aLab, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany (e-mail: hu@isek. rwth-aachen.de; sun@isek.rwth-aachen.de; schmeink@isek.rwth-aachen.de).
Publisher Copyright:
© 1967-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - We consider a fully-loaded ground wireless network supporting unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) transmission services. To enable the overload transmissions to a ground user (GU) and a UAV, two transmission schemes are employed, namely non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and relaying, depending on whether or not the GU and UAV are served simultaneously. Under the assumption of the system operating with infinite blocklength (IBL) codes, the IBL throughputs of both the GU and the UAV are derived under the two schemes. More importantly, we also consider the scenario in which data packets are transmitted via finite blocklength (FBL) codes, i.e., data transmission to both the UAV and the GU is performed under low-latency and high reliability constraints. In this setting, the FBL throughputs are characterized again considering the two schemes of NOMA and relaying. Following the IBL and FBL throughput characterizations, optimal resource allocation designs are subsequently proposed to maximize the UAV throughput while guaranteeing the throughput of the cellular user. Moreover, we prove that the relaying scheme is able to provide transmission service to the UAV while improving the GU's performance, and that the relaying scheme potentially offers a higher throughput to the UAV in the FBL regime than in the IBL regime. On the other hand, the NOMA scheme provides a higher UAV throughput (than relaying) by slightly sacrificing the GU's performance.
AB - We consider a fully-loaded ground wireless network supporting unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) transmission services. To enable the overload transmissions to a ground user (GU) and a UAV, two transmission schemes are employed, namely non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and relaying, depending on whether or not the GU and UAV are served simultaneously. Under the assumption of the system operating with infinite blocklength (IBL) codes, the IBL throughputs of both the GU and the UAV are derived under the two schemes. More importantly, we also consider the scenario in which data packets are transmitted via finite blocklength (FBL) codes, i.e., data transmission to both the UAV and the GU is performed under low-latency and high reliability constraints. In this setting, the FBL throughputs are characterized again considering the two schemes of NOMA and relaying. Following the IBL and FBL throughput characterizations, optimal resource allocation designs are subsequently proposed to maximize the UAV throughput while guaranteeing the throughput of the cellular user. Moreover, we prove that the relaying scheme is able to provide transmission service to the UAV while improving the GU's performance, and that the relaying scheme potentially offers a higher throughput to the UAV in the FBL regime than in the IBL regime. On the other hand, the NOMA scheme provides a higher UAV throughput (than relaying) by slightly sacrificing the GU's performance.
KW - Finite blocklength coding
KW - UAV
KW - noma
KW - relaying
KW - resource allocation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090147460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090147460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TVT.2020.2998899
DO - 10.1109/TVT.2020.2998899
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090147460
SN - 0018-9545
VL - 69
SP - 8972
EP - 8984
JO - IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
JF - IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
IS - 8
M1 - 9104857
ER -