TY - GEN
T1 - Optimal configuration of series and parallel elasticity in a 2D Monoped
AU - Yesilevskiy, Yevgeniy
AU - Gan, Zhenyu
AU - Remy, C. David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/6/8
Y1 - 2016/6/8
N2 - This paper uses optimal control to simultaneously optimize the motion and morphology of a realistic model of a 2D Monoped. In particular, we compare the energetics of four different actuator configurations: a parallel elastic actuator (PEA) in the hip and a series elastic actuator in the leg (SEA), series hip and parallel leg, series hip and series leg, and parallel hip and parallel leg. We use realistic models with mass in the legs and feet, damping in the springs, and detailed DC electric motor models. The comparison is carried out for the cost of transport of three energetic measures: positive motor work, electrical losses, and positive electrical work, and evaluated as a function of velocity. In our optimization we include motor parameters, stiffness, and spring pre-compression terms as free variables, ensuring that we compare the energetically optimal version of each configuration at each velocity. We show that for the positive motor work and the electrical losses costs of transport (COT), the parallel hip and series leg configuration is energetically optimal. For the electrical work, the optimal configuration is speed dependent, with series hip and parallel leg optimal at low speeds, and both series hip series leg and parallel hip series leg optimal at high speeds.
AB - This paper uses optimal control to simultaneously optimize the motion and morphology of a realistic model of a 2D Monoped. In particular, we compare the energetics of four different actuator configurations: a parallel elastic actuator (PEA) in the hip and a series elastic actuator in the leg (SEA), series hip and parallel leg, series hip and series leg, and parallel hip and parallel leg. We use realistic models with mass in the legs and feet, damping in the springs, and detailed DC electric motor models. The comparison is carried out for the cost of transport of three energetic measures: positive motor work, electrical losses, and positive electrical work, and evaluated as a function of velocity. In our optimization we include motor parameters, stiffness, and spring pre-compression terms as free variables, ensuring that we compare the energetically optimal version of each configuration at each velocity. We show that for the positive motor work and the electrical losses costs of transport (COT), the parallel hip and series leg configuration is energetically optimal. For the electrical work, the optimal configuration is speed dependent, with series hip and parallel leg optimal at low speeds, and both series hip series leg and parallel hip series leg optimal at high speeds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977536434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977536434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487269
DO - 10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487269
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84977536434
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
SP - 1360
EP - 1365
BT - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2016
Y2 - 16 May 2016 through 21 May 2016
ER -