On the Rhetoric of Dissenting Judges: Ideology, History, and Politics in Obergefell v. Hodges

Amardo Rodriguez

doi:10.1177/1532708616640006

On the Rhetoric of Dissenting Judges: Ideology, History, and Politics in Obergefell v. Hodges

Amardo Rodriguez

Department of Communication & Rhetorical Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In this article, I identify and look critically at the ideological themes that form the foundation of the dissenting opinions in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges. I contend that these themes speak to much larger issues surrounding the nature of our democracy and why accommodating different ways of being continues to face daunting legal, social, and political hurdles.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	140-148
Number of pages	9
Journal	Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies
Volume	18
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616640006
State	Published - Apr 1 2018

Keywords

GLBT issues and theory
counter-narrative
gender and sexuality
methods of inquiry
queer theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cultural Studies
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1177/1532708616640006

Cite this

@article{efca7adb03d34809b3b97cf075f5b28a,

title = "On the Rhetoric of Dissenting Judges: Ideology, History, and Politics in Obergefell v. Hodges",

abstract = "In this article, I identify and look critically at the ideological themes that form the foundation of the dissenting opinions in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges. I contend that these themes speak to much larger issues surrounding the nature of our democracy and why accommodating different ways of being continues to face daunting legal, social, and political hurdles.",

keywords = "GLBT issues and theory, counter-narrative, gender and sexuality, methods of inquiry, queer theory",

author = "Amardo Rodriguez",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, {\textcopyright} 2016 SAGE Publications.",

year = "2018",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1532708616640006",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "18",

pages = "140--148",

journal = "Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies",

issn = "1532-7086",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Rhetoric of Dissenting Judges

T2 - Ideology, History, and Politics in Obergefell v. Hodges

AU - Rodriguez, Amardo

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - In this article, I identify and look critically at the ideological themes that form the foundation of the dissenting opinions in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges. I contend that these themes speak to much larger issues surrounding the nature of our democracy and why accommodating different ways of being continues to face daunting legal, social, and political hurdles.

AB - In this article, I identify and look critically at the ideological themes that form the foundation of the dissenting opinions in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges. I contend that these themes speak to much larger issues surrounding the nature of our democracy and why accommodating different ways of being continues to face daunting legal, social, and political hurdles.

KW - GLBT issues and theory

KW - counter-narrative

KW - gender and sexuality

KW - methods of inquiry

KW - queer theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044149877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044149877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1532708616640006

DO - 10.1177/1532708616640006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044149877

SN - 1532-7086

VL - 18

SP - 140

EP - 148

JO - Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies

JF - Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies

IS - 2

ER -

On the Rhetoric of Dissenting Judges: Ideology, History, and Politics in Obergefell v. Hodges

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this