On the discriminability of keystroke feature vectors used in fixed text keystroke authentication

Kiran S. Balagani, Vir V. Phoha, Asok Ray, Shashi Phoha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Heterogeneous and aggregate vectors are the two widely used feature vectors in fixed text keystroke authentication. In this paper, we address the question "Which vectors, heterogeneous, aggregate, or a combination of both, are more discriminative and why?" We accomplish this in three ways - (1) by providing an intuitive example to illustrate how aggregation of features inherently reduces discriminability; (2) by formulating " discriminability" as a non-parametric estimate of Bhattacharya distance, we show theoretically that the discriminability of a heterogeneous vector is higher than an aggregate vector; and (3) by conducting user recognition experiments using a dataset containing keystrokes from 33 users typing a 32-character reference text, we empirically validate our theoretical analysis. To compare the discriminability of heterogeneous and aggregate vectors with different combinations of keystroke features, we conduct feature selection analysis using three methods: (1) ReliefF, (2) correlation based feature selection, and (3) consistency based feature selection. Results of feature selection analysis reinforce the findings of our theoretical analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1070-1080
Number of pages11
JournalPattern Recognition Letters
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bhattacharya distance
  • Feature selection analysis
  • Keystroke dynamics
  • Mahalanobis distance
  • Parzen window
  • User recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Signal Processing
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On the discriminability of keystroke feature vectors used in fixed text keystroke authentication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this