No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster

William D. Brown, Adam Bjork, Karin Schneider, Scott Pitnick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Understanding the evolution of polyandry (mating with multiple males) is a major issue in the study of animal breeding systems. We examined the adaptive significance of polyandry in Drosophila melanogaster, a species with well-documented costs of mating in which males generally cannot force copulations. We found no direct fitness advantages of polyandry. Females that mated with multiple males had no greater mean fitness and no different variance in fitness than females that mated repeatedly with the same male. Subcomponents of reproductive success, including fecundity, egg hatch rate, larval viability, and larval development time, also did not differ between polyandrous and monogamous females. Polyandry had no affect on progeny sex ratios, suggesting that polyandry does not function against costly sex-ratio distorters. We also found no evidence that polyandry functions to favor the paternity of males successful in precopulatory sexual selection. Experimentally controlled opportunities for precopulatory sexual selection had no effect on postcopulatory sperm precedence. Although these results were generally negative, they are supported with substantial statistical power and they help narrow the list of evolutionary explanations for polyandry in an important model species.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1242-1250
Number of pages9
JournalEvolution
Volume58
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2004

Keywords

  • Multiple mating
  • Offspring viability
  • Polyandry
  • Reproductive success
  • Sexual selection
  • Sperm competition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this