TY - JOUR
T1 - Nitrogen pollution in the northeastern United States
T2 - Sources, effects, and management options
AU - Driscoll, Charles T.
AU - Whitall, David
AU - Aber, John
AU - Boyer, Elizabeth
AU - Castro, Mark
AU - Cronan, Christopher
AU - Goodale, Christine L.
AU - Groffman, Peter
AU - Hopkinson, Charles
AU - Lambert, Kathleen
AU - Lawrence, Gregory
AU - Ollinger, Scott
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was convened through the Science Links program of the Hubbard Brook Research Foundation with support from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, the Jessie B. Cox Charitable Trust, the John Merck Fund, the Merck Family Fund, the McCabe Environmental Fund, and the Harold Whitworth Pierce Charitable Trust. This project was also supported through grants from the W. M. Keck Foundation and the National Science Foundation to Charles Driscoll. We would like to thank Patrick Phillips and the US Geological Survey Hudson River National Water-Quality Assessment Study for providing streamwater N data, Bryan Bloomer (EPA) and Robin Dennis (EPA/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) for Long Island Sound airshed calculations, Kimberley Driscoll (Syracuse University) for help in figure preparation, and Limin Chen (Syracuse University) for help with PnET modeling. We are indebted to Gene E. Likens for use of long-term biogeochemical data from the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study. Some data in this publication were obtained by the scientists of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study; this publication has not been reviewed by all of those scientists. The Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest is operated and maintained by the Northeastern Research Station, US Department of Agriculture, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. We would particularly like to thank Herb Bormann (Yale University), Rick Haeuber (Clean Air Markets Division, EPA), Debora Martin (EPA), David Shaw (Division of Air, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation [DEP]), and Paul Stacey (Connecticut DEP) for serving as advisers to this project. The findings published here are independent and do not necessarily reflect the views of the people listed here.
PY - 2003/4/1
Y1 - 2003/4/1
N2 - The northeastern United States receives elevated inputs of anthropogenic nitrogen (N) largely from net imports of food and atmospheric deposition, with lesser inputs from fertilizer, net feed imports, and N fixation associated with leguminous crops. Ecological consequences of elevated N inputs to the Northeast include tropospheric ozone formation, ozone damage to plants, the alteration of forest N cycles, acidification of surface waters, and eutrophication in coastal waters. We used two models, PnET-BGC and WATERSN, to evaluate management strategies for reducing N inputs to forests and estuaries, respectively. Calculations with PnET-BGC suggest that aggressive reductions in N emissions alone will not result in marked improvements in the acid-base status of forest streams. WATERSN calculations showed that management scenarios targeting removal of N by wastewater treatment produce larger reductions in estuarine N loading than scenarios involving reductions in agricultural inputs or atmospheric emissions. Because N pollution involves multiple sources, management strategies targeting all major pollution sources will result in the greatest ecological benefits.
AB - The northeastern United States receives elevated inputs of anthropogenic nitrogen (N) largely from net imports of food and atmospheric deposition, with lesser inputs from fertilizer, net feed imports, and N fixation associated with leguminous crops. Ecological consequences of elevated N inputs to the Northeast include tropospheric ozone formation, ozone damage to plants, the alteration of forest N cycles, acidification of surface waters, and eutrophication in coastal waters. We used two models, PnET-BGC and WATERSN, to evaluate management strategies for reducing N inputs to forests and estuaries, respectively. Calculations with PnET-BGC suggest that aggressive reductions in N emissions alone will not result in marked improvements in the acid-base status of forest streams. WATERSN calculations showed that management scenarios targeting removal of N by wastewater treatment produce larger reductions in estuarine N loading than scenarios involving reductions in agricultural inputs or atmospheric emissions. Because N pollution involves multiple sources, management strategies targeting all major pollution sources will result in the greatest ecological benefits.
KW - Atmospheric deposition
KW - Nitrogen management
KW - Northeastern United States
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037387841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037387841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2
DO - 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0037387841
SN - 0006-3568
VL - 53
SP - 357
EP - 374
JO - BioScience
JF - BioScience
IS - 4
ER -