TY - GEN
T1 - Necessity of dimensional support for the reliable calculation of finite-time l
AU - Rockwood, Matthew P.
AU - Green, Melissa A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Using Lagrangian techniques to find transport barriers in complex, aperiodic flows necessitates a careful consideration of the available dimensional support of the data being analyzed. To illustrate this, planar finite-time Lyapunov exponent (FTLE) fields are computed from experimentally collected velocity fields. The FTLE fields calculated using three-component, three-dimensional velocity information (3D FTLE) are compared with calculations using two-dimensional data, and considering only the in-plane velocities (2D FTLE). In some regions, where the vortex rotation axis is perpendicular to the plane of interest, the 2D FTLE may perform well. However, in regions where the vortex rotation axis is parallel to the plane of interest, whole structures are simply not captured by the 2D FTLE, compared with the 3D FTLE. A quantitative analysis of the error as it relates to Instantaneous Vorticity Deviation (IVD) core angle was conducted using experimental data collected in the wake of a bio-inspired pitching panel. Lack of proper dimensional support in experimental velocity fields can cause major errors in the resulting FTLE, but with fundamental understanding about the flow field of interest, such as local vortex orientation, some of the pitfalls may be avoided.
AB - Using Lagrangian techniques to find transport barriers in complex, aperiodic flows necessitates a careful consideration of the available dimensional support of the data being analyzed. To illustrate this, planar finite-time Lyapunov exponent (FTLE) fields are computed from experimentally collected velocity fields. The FTLE fields calculated using three-component, three-dimensional velocity information (3D FTLE) are compared with calculations using two-dimensional data, and considering only the in-plane velocities (2D FTLE). In some regions, where the vortex rotation axis is perpendicular to the plane of interest, the 2D FTLE may perform well. However, in regions where the vortex rotation axis is parallel to the plane of interest, whole structures are simply not captured by the 2D FTLE, compared with the 3D FTLE. A quantitative analysis of the error as it relates to Instantaneous Vorticity Deviation (IVD) core angle was conducted using experimental data collected in the wake of a bio-inspired pitching panel. Lack of proper dimensional support in experimental velocity fields can cause major errors in the resulting FTLE, but with fundamental understanding about the flow field of interest, such as local vortex orientation, some of the pitfalls may be avoided.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051302411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051302411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2018-4159
DO - 10.2514/6.2018-4159
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85051302411
SN - 9781624105531
T3 - 2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference
BT - 2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - 48th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2018
Y2 - 25 June 2018 through 29 June 2018
ER -