Muslim Family Laws in Israel and Greece

Can Non-Muslim Courts Bring about Legal Change in Shari'a?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Should a democratic regime formally incorporate religious laws and courts into its otherwise secular legal system? This is not a hypothetical question. Some democratic nations already formally integrate religion-based laws in the field of family law (especially Muslim Family Law - MFL). Although state-enforced MFLs often affect human rights negatively, many governments, especially non-Muslim majority ones, have refrained from direct legislative interventions into substantive MFLs. Instead they have empowered civil courts to play the role of "reformer." But how successful have civil judiciaries in non-Muslim regimes been in "reforming" Muslim laws? On the basis of an analysis of the MFL jurisprudence of Israeli and Greek civil courts over the last three decades, I argue that civil courts could not have brought about any direct changes in Muslim law, however, they have had an indirect effect by pressuring religious courts/authorities to undertake self-reform.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-273
Number of pages39
JournalIslamic Law and Society
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

family law
civil court
Greece
Muslim
Israel
Law
regime
legal system
jurisprudence
Israeli
human rights
Religion
reform

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Greece
  • Israel
  • Legal pluralism
  • Legal reform
  • Multiculturalism
  • Muslim family law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Muslim Family Laws in Israel and Greece : Can Non-Muslim Courts Bring about Legal Change in Shari'a? / Sezgin, Yuksel.

In: Islamic Law and Society, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 235-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{673be1d41a0a4cea8fed968651bd0ff4,
title = "Muslim Family Laws in Israel and Greece: Can Non-Muslim Courts Bring about Legal Change in Shari'a?",
abstract = "Should a democratic regime formally incorporate religious laws and courts into its otherwise secular legal system? This is not a hypothetical question. Some democratic nations already formally integrate religion-based laws in the field of family law (especially Muslim Family Law - MFL). Although state-enforced MFLs often affect human rights negatively, many governments, especially non-Muslim majority ones, have refrained from direct legislative interventions into substantive MFLs. Instead they have empowered civil courts to play the role of {"}reformer.{"} But how successful have civil judiciaries in non-Muslim regimes been in {"}reforming{"} Muslim laws? On the basis of an analysis of the MFL jurisprudence of Israeli and Greek civil courts over the last three decades, I argue that civil courts could not have brought about any direct changes in Muslim law, however, they have had an indirect effect by pressuring religious courts/authorities to undertake self-reform.",
keywords = "Democracy, Greece, Israel, Legal pluralism, Legal reform, Multiculturalism, Muslim family law",
author = "Yuksel Sezgin",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/15685195-00253P03",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "235--273",
journal = "Islamic Law and Society",
issn = "0928-9380",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Muslim Family Laws in Israel and Greece

T2 - Can Non-Muslim Courts Bring about Legal Change in Shari'a?

AU - Sezgin, Yuksel

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Should a democratic regime formally incorporate religious laws and courts into its otherwise secular legal system? This is not a hypothetical question. Some democratic nations already formally integrate religion-based laws in the field of family law (especially Muslim Family Law - MFL). Although state-enforced MFLs often affect human rights negatively, many governments, especially non-Muslim majority ones, have refrained from direct legislative interventions into substantive MFLs. Instead they have empowered civil courts to play the role of "reformer." But how successful have civil judiciaries in non-Muslim regimes been in "reforming" Muslim laws? On the basis of an analysis of the MFL jurisprudence of Israeli and Greek civil courts over the last three decades, I argue that civil courts could not have brought about any direct changes in Muslim law, however, they have had an indirect effect by pressuring religious courts/authorities to undertake self-reform.

AB - Should a democratic regime formally incorporate religious laws and courts into its otherwise secular legal system? This is not a hypothetical question. Some democratic nations already formally integrate religion-based laws in the field of family law (especially Muslim Family Law - MFL). Although state-enforced MFLs often affect human rights negatively, many governments, especially non-Muslim majority ones, have refrained from direct legislative interventions into substantive MFLs. Instead they have empowered civil courts to play the role of "reformer." But how successful have civil judiciaries in non-Muslim regimes been in "reforming" Muslim laws? On the basis of an analysis of the MFL jurisprudence of Israeli and Greek civil courts over the last three decades, I argue that civil courts could not have brought about any direct changes in Muslim law, however, they have had an indirect effect by pressuring religious courts/authorities to undertake self-reform.

KW - Democracy

KW - Greece

KW - Israel

KW - Legal pluralism

KW - Legal reform

KW - Multiculturalism

KW - Muslim family law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047725311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047725311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15685195-00253P03

DO - 10.1163/15685195-00253P03

M3 - Review article

VL - 25

SP - 235

EP - 273

JO - Islamic Law and Society

JF - Islamic Law and Society

SN - 0928-9380

IS - 3

ER -