Multiple Perspectives on the State-Mandated Implementation of a High-Stakes Performance Assessment for Preservice English Teacher Candidates

Kelly Chandler-Olcott, Sarah Fleming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on situated learning and communities of practice, this teacher-research study examined multiple stakeholders’ perspectives about the purpose, design, and inaugural implementation of the edTPA, a teacher performance assessment mandated for state certification. Participants included teacher candidates, mentor teachers, a field placement supervisor, and a teacher educator involved with one English education program. Data included edTPA-related documents, artifacts from a student-teaching seminar, and interviews. Findings indicated differences in perspective. Mentors had the most negative views and the least information about the assessment, as well as the most skepticism about its positioning within the state’s reform agenda. Candidates and the field supervisor identified benefits and concerns about the impact on student teaching. The teacher educator expressed anger and fear related to the new mandate but, over time, identified some aspects of the assessment aligning with past practice. Implications for research and practice are suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-38
Number of pages17
JournalAction in Teacher Education
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

performance assessment
candidacy
teacher
educator
Teaching
anger
certification
artifact
student
stakeholder
anxiety
reform
interview
learning
community
education

Keywords

  • teacher education
  • teacher performance assessments
  • teacher research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{7a4968c786bd47ac8d48073a04346e00,
title = "Multiple Perspectives on the State-Mandated Implementation of a High-Stakes Performance Assessment for Preservice English Teacher Candidates",
abstract = "Drawing on situated learning and communities of practice, this teacher-research study examined multiple stakeholders’ perspectives about the purpose, design, and inaugural implementation of the edTPA, a teacher performance assessment mandated for state certification. Participants included teacher candidates, mentor teachers, a field placement supervisor, and a teacher educator involved with one English education program. Data included edTPA-related documents, artifacts from a student-teaching seminar, and interviews. Findings indicated differences in perspective. Mentors had the most negative views and the least information about the assessment, as well as the most skepticism about its positioning within the state’s reform agenda. Candidates and the field supervisor identified benefits and concerns about the impact on student teaching. The teacher educator expressed anger and fear related to the new mandate but, over time, identified some aspects of the assessment aligning with past practice. Implications for research and practice are suggested.",
keywords = "teacher education, teacher performance assessments, teacher research",
author = "Kelly Chandler-Olcott and Sarah Fleming",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01626620.2016.1252703",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "22--38",
journal = "Action in Teacher Education",
issn = "0162-6620",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple Perspectives on the State-Mandated Implementation of a High-Stakes Performance Assessment for Preservice English Teacher Candidates

AU - Chandler-Olcott, Kelly

AU - Fleming, Sarah

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Drawing on situated learning and communities of practice, this teacher-research study examined multiple stakeholders’ perspectives about the purpose, design, and inaugural implementation of the edTPA, a teacher performance assessment mandated for state certification. Participants included teacher candidates, mentor teachers, a field placement supervisor, and a teacher educator involved with one English education program. Data included edTPA-related documents, artifacts from a student-teaching seminar, and interviews. Findings indicated differences in perspective. Mentors had the most negative views and the least information about the assessment, as well as the most skepticism about its positioning within the state’s reform agenda. Candidates and the field supervisor identified benefits and concerns about the impact on student teaching. The teacher educator expressed anger and fear related to the new mandate but, over time, identified some aspects of the assessment aligning with past practice. Implications for research and practice are suggested.

AB - Drawing on situated learning and communities of practice, this teacher-research study examined multiple stakeholders’ perspectives about the purpose, design, and inaugural implementation of the edTPA, a teacher performance assessment mandated for state certification. Participants included teacher candidates, mentor teachers, a field placement supervisor, and a teacher educator involved with one English education program. Data included edTPA-related documents, artifacts from a student-teaching seminar, and interviews. Findings indicated differences in perspective. Mentors had the most negative views and the least information about the assessment, as well as the most skepticism about its positioning within the state’s reform agenda. Candidates and the field supervisor identified benefits and concerns about the impact on student teaching. The teacher educator expressed anger and fear related to the new mandate but, over time, identified some aspects of the assessment aligning with past practice. Implications for research and practice are suggested.

KW - teacher education

KW - teacher performance assessments

KW - teacher research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045677942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045677942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01626620.2016.1252703

DO - 10.1080/01626620.2016.1252703

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 22

EP - 38

JO - Action in Teacher Education

JF - Action in Teacher Education

SN - 0162-6620

IS - 1

ER -