Motives for Patenting a Map Projection: Did Fame Trump Fortune?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

John Parr Snyder claimed that patenting a map projection was largely pointless because essentially similar transformations are readily available in the public domain. Map projection patents are rare, many patentees did not attempt to develop their patents, and none who did seems to have made much money. An explanation for their decision to patent lies in recognition that the patent system and peer-reviewed scientific journals are parallel literatures, either of which can satisfy an innovator’s need for attention, as suggested by achievement motivation theory. Moreover, no single factor can account for the invention of a map projection that was patented: not mathematical expertise; not work experience as a draftsman, map publisher, or professional geographer; and not prior experience with the patents system. But for all but one of the 17 inventors for whom microdata research tools yielded basic details about their lives, at least one of these factors was present.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-202
Number of pages7
JournalCartographic Journal
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2018

Fingerprint

patent
need
decision
public domain

Keywords

  • achievement motivation theory
  • History of cartography
  • invention
  • John Parr Snyder
  • map projection
  • patents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Motives for Patenting a Map Projection : Did Fame Trump Fortune? / Monmonier, Mark.

In: Cartographic Journal, Vol. 55, No. 2, 03.04.2018, p. 196-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2dd3ab2552c4e5b8ebf6b33269f2c84,
title = "Motives for Patenting a Map Projection: Did Fame Trump Fortune?",
abstract = "John Parr Snyder claimed that patenting a map projection was largely pointless because essentially similar transformations are readily available in the public domain. Map projection patents are rare, many patentees did not attempt to develop their patents, and none who did seems to have made much money. An explanation for their decision to patent lies in recognition that the patent system and peer-reviewed scientific journals are parallel literatures, either of which can satisfy an innovator’s need for attention, as suggested by achievement motivation theory. Moreover, no single factor can account for the invention of a map projection that was patented: not mathematical expertise; not work experience as a draftsman, map publisher, or professional geographer; and not prior experience with the patents system. But for all but one of the 17 inventors for whom microdata research tools yielded basic details about their lives, at least one of these factors was present.",
keywords = "achievement motivation theory, History of cartography, invention, John Parr Snyder, map projection, patents",
author = "Mark Monmonier",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00087041.2018.1448563",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "196--202",
journal = "Cartographic Journal",
issn = "0008-7041",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motives for Patenting a Map Projection

T2 - Did Fame Trump Fortune?

AU - Monmonier, Mark

PY - 2018/4/3

Y1 - 2018/4/3

N2 - John Parr Snyder claimed that patenting a map projection was largely pointless because essentially similar transformations are readily available in the public domain. Map projection patents are rare, many patentees did not attempt to develop their patents, and none who did seems to have made much money. An explanation for their decision to patent lies in recognition that the patent system and peer-reviewed scientific journals are parallel literatures, either of which can satisfy an innovator’s need for attention, as suggested by achievement motivation theory. Moreover, no single factor can account for the invention of a map projection that was patented: not mathematical expertise; not work experience as a draftsman, map publisher, or professional geographer; and not prior experience with the patents system. But for all but one of the 17 inventors for whom microdata research tools yielded basic details about their lives, at least one of these factors was present.

AB - John Parr Snyder claimed that patenting a map projection was largely pointless because essentially similar transformations are readily available in the public domain. Map projection patents are rare, many patentees did not attempt to develop their patents, and none who did seems to have made much money. An explanation for their decision to patent lies in recognition that the patent system and peer-reviewed scientific journals are parallel literatures, either of which can satisfy an innovator’s need for attention, as suggested by achievement motivation theory. Moreover, no single factor can account for the invention of a map projection that was patented: not mathematical expertise; not work experience as a draftsman, map publisher, or professional geographer; and not prior experience with the patents system. But for all but one of the 17 inventors for whom microdata research tools yielded basic details about their lives, at least one of these factors was present.

KW - achievement motivation theory

KW - History of cartography

KW - invention

KW - John Parr Snyder

KW - map projection

KW - patents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049808030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049808030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00087041.2018.1448563

DO - 10.1080/00087041.2018.1448563

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049808030

VL - 55

SP - 196

EP - 202

JO - Cartographic Journal

JF - Cartographic Journal

SN - 0008-7041

IS - 2

ER -