Modeling transition rates using panel current-status data: How serious is the bias?

Douglas A. Wolf, Thomas M. Gill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations


Studies of disability dynamics and active life expectancy often rely on transition rates or probabilities that are estimated using panel survey data in which respondents report on current health or functional status. If respondents are contacted at intervals of one or two years, then relatively short periods of disability or recovery between surveys may be missed. Much published research that uses such data assumes that there are no unrecorded transitions, applying event-history techniques to estimate transition rates. In recent years, a different approach based on embedded Markov chains has received growing use. We assessed the performance of both approaches, using as a criterion their ability to reproduce the parameters of a "true" model based on panel data collected at one-month intervals. Neither of the widely used approaches performs particularly well, and neither is uniformly superior to the other.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-386
Number of pages16
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography


Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling transition rates using panel current-status data: How serious is the bias?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this