TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling of thermal response and ablation in laminated glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites due to lightning strike
AU - Wang, Yeqing
AU - Zhupanska, Olesya I.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant number EPS-1101284 . Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this work are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Thermal response and ablation of laminated glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites subjected to lightning strike are studied. The associated nonlinear time-dependent heat transfer model includes specific features of lightning arcs observed in physical measurements such as lightning channel radius expansion, non-uniform lightning current density, and associated heat flux. Moving spatially and temporally non-uniform lightning-current-induced heat flux boundary and moving boundary due to material phase transition caused by rapid surface ablation are also included. To predict moving phase boundary in the laminated anisotropic composites, an element deletion method is developed and embedded into finite element analysis (FEA), which is performed using ABAQUS. The Umeshmotion + ALE method based on the user subroutine Umeshmotion and arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) adaptive mesh technique is also used, when applicable (i.e., moving phase boundary is confined within a top layer of the composite laminate). Heat transfer analysis is performed for a non-conductive laminated glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite panel representing the SNL 100-00 wind turbine tip. Thermal response of the panel subjected to pulsed and continuing lightning currents at three different lightning protection levels, LPL I, LPL II, and LPL III, is studied. Temperature-dependent anisotropic thermal properties of the composite panel are included in the analysis. The FEA results include temperature distributions and ablation zone profiles. The results show the Umeshmotion + ALE method is sufficient for the pulsed lightning current at all three LPL levels since the moving phase boundary, i.e. the ablation front, is found to be confined within the top layer of the laminate. For the continuing lightning currents at all three LPL levels, the Umeshmotion + ALE method is not applicable since the moving phase boundary comes to rest at depths exceeding the thickness of the top layer of the composite laminate.
AB - Thermal response and ablation of laminated glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites subjected to lightning strike are studied. The associated nonlinear time-dependent heat transfer model includes specific features of lightning arcs observed in physical measurements such as lightning channel radius expansion, non-uniform lightning current density, and associated heat flux. Moving spatially and temporally non-uniform lightning-current-induced heat flux boundary and moving boundary due to material phase transition caused by rapid surface ablation are also included. To predict moving phase boundary in the laminated anisotropic composites, an element deletion method is developed and embedded into finite element analysis (FEA), which is performed using ABAQUS. The Umeshmotion + ALE method based on the user subroutine Umeshmotion and arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) adaptive mesh technique is also used, when applicable (i.e., moving phase boundary is confined within a top layer of the composite laminate). Heat transfer analysis is performed for a non-conductive laminated glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite panel representing the SNL 100-00 wind turbine tip. Thermal response of the panel subjected to pulsed and continuing lightning currents at three different lightning protection levels, LPL I, LPL II, and LPL III, is studied. Temperature-dependent anisotropic thermal properties of the composite panel are included in the analysis. The FEA results include temperature distributions and ablation zone profiles. The results show the Umeshmotion + ALE method is sufficient for the pulsed lightning current at all three LPL levels since the moving phase boundary, i.e. the ablation front, is found to be confined within the top layer of the laminate. For the continuing lightning currents at all three LPL levels, the Umeshmotion + ALE method is not applicable since the moving phase boundary comes to rest at depths exceeding the thickness of the top layer of the composite laminate.
KW - Element deletion method
KW - Finite element analysis
KW - Lightning strike
KW - Moving boundaries
KW - Polymer matrix composite
KW - Thermal ablation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038852583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038852583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apm.2017.08.019
DO - 10.1016/j.apm.2017.08.019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85038852583
SN - 0307-904X
VL - 53
SP - 118
EP - 131
JO - Applied Mathematical Modelling
JF - Applied Mathematical Modelling
ER -