TY - JOUR

T1 - Misinterpreting modified gravity as dark energy

T2 - A quantitative study

AU - Wen, Yuewei

AU - Nesbit, Eva

AU - Huterer, Dragan

AU - Watson, Scott

N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IOP Publishing Ltd and Sissa Medialab.

PY - 2022/3/1

Y1 - 2022/3/1

N2 - Standard cosmological data analyses typically constrain simple phenomenological dark-energy parameters, for example the present-day value of the equation of state parameter, w 0, and its variation with scale factor, w a. However, results from such an analysis cannot easily indicate the presence of modified gravity. Even if general relativity does not hold, experimental data could still be fit sufficiently well by a phenomenological w 0 w aCDM, unmodified-gravity model. Hence, it would be very useful to know if there are generic signatures of modified gravity in standard analyses. Here we present, for the first time to our knowledge, a quantitative mapping showing how modified gravity models look when (mis)interpreted within the standard unmodified-gravity analysis. Scanning through a broad space of modified-gravity (Horndeski) models, and assuming a near-future survey consisting of CMB, BAO, and SNIa observations, we report values of the best-fit set of cosmological parameters including (w 0, w a) that would be inferred if modified gravity were at work. We find that modified gravity models that can masquerade as standard gravity lead to very specific biases in standard-parameter spaces. We also comment on implications for measurements of the amplitude of mass fluctuations described by the parameter S 8.

AB - Standard cosmological data analyses typically constrain simple phenomenological dark-energy parameters, for example the present-day value of the equation of state parameter, w 0, and its variation with scale factor, w a. However, results from such an analysis cannot easily indicate the presence of modified gravity. Even if general relativity does not hold, experimental data could still be fit sufficiently well by a phenomenological w 0 w aCDM, unmodified-gravity model. Hence, it would be very useful to know if there are generic signatures of modified gravity in standard analyses. Here we present, for the first time to our knowledge, a quantitative mapping showing how modified gravity models look when (mis)interpreted within the standard unmodified-gravity analysis. Scanning through a broad space of modified-gravity (Horndeski) models, and assuming a near-future survey consisting of CMB, BAO, and SNIa observations, we report values of the best-fit set of cosmological parameters including (w 0, w a) that would be inferred if modified gravity were at work. We find that modified gravity models that can masquerade as standard gravity lead to very specific biases in standard-parameter spaces. We also comment on implications for measurements of the amplitude of mass fluctuations described by the parameter S 8.

KW - Machine learning

KW - dark energy theory

KW - modified gravity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127342411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127342411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/03/042

DO - 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/03/042

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85127342411

SN - 1475-7516

VL - 2022

JO - Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

JF - Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

IS - 3

M1 - 042

ER -