Method choice: Five discussant commentaries

Jennifer C. Greene, Mark W. Lipsey, Thomas A. Schwandt, Nick L. Smith, Roland G. Tharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations


Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence about methods choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-127
Number of pages17
JournalNew Directions for Evaluation
Issue number113
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Method choice: Five discussant commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Greene, J. C., Lipsey, M. W., Schwandt, T. A., Smith, N. L., & Tharp, R. G. (2007). Method choice: Five discussant commentaries. New Directions for Evaluation, 2007(113), 111-127.