Method choice: Five discussant commentaries

Jennifer C. Greene; Mark W. Lipsey; Thomas A. Schwandt; Nick L. Smith; Roland G. Tharp

doi:10.1002/ev.218

Method choice: Five discussant commentaries

Jennifer C. Greene, Mark W. Lipsey, Thomas A. Schwandt, Nick L. Smith, Roland G. Tharp

Instructional Design, Development & Evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence about methods choice.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	111-127
Number of pages	17
Journal	New Directions for Evaluation
Volume	2007
Issue number	113
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.218
State	Published - 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Education
Strategy and Management
Management Science and Operations Research

Access to Document

10.1002/ev.218

Cite this

@article{9507122ead344e969fd67fda5e1a434e,

title = "Method choice: Five discussant commentaries",

abstract = "Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence about methods choice.",

author = "Greene, {Jennifer C.} and Lipsey, {Mark W.} and Schwandt, {Thomas A.} and Smith, {Nick L.} and Tharp, {Roland G.}",

year = "2007",

doi = "10.1002/ev.218",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2007",

pages = "111--127",

journal = "New Directions for Evaluation",

issn = "1097-6736",

publisher = "Jossey-Bass Inc.",

number = "113",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Method choice

T2 - Five discussant commentaries

AU - Greene, Jennifer C.

AU - Lipsey, Mark W.

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A.

AU - Smith, Nick L.

AU - Tharp, Roland G.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence about methods choice.

AB - Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence about methods choice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249149165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51249149165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ev.218

DO - 10.1002/ev.218

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:51249149165

SN - 1097-6736

VL - 2007

SP - 111

EP - 127

JO - New Directions for Evaluation

JF - New Directions for Evaluation

IS - 113

ER -

Method choice: Five discussant commentaries

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this