TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about family-teacher communication
T2 - Scale construction and validation
AU - De Coninck, Karen
AU - Walker, Joan
AU - Dotger, Benjamin
AU - Vanderlinde, Ruben
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - This article describes the development of a self-report survey measure of student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about family-teacher communication. Consistent with a guiding conceptual framework (Walker & Dotger, 2012), an exploratory factor analysis (n = 266) suggested a two-factor structure: (1) structuring the conversation (α = .92) and (2) responsiveness to parents (α = .87). Confirmatory factor analysis with a second sample (n = 315) also indicated a good fit between the hypothesized two-factor model and the observed data. Despite their lack of experience, student teachers’ self-efficacy ratings were relatively high. Efficacy for structuring conversations (M = 6.7, SD = 1.02; range = 0–10) was lower than efficacy for responsiveness (M = 7.57, SD = 1.04; difference, -0.83, t(581)=−21.32, p < .01). Development of this measure is important because it underscores the complexity of family-teacher conference communication and the need for teacher competence at separate but related facets of communication. Implications for research and teacher education practices are discussed.
AB - This article describes the development of a self-report survey measure of student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about family-teacher communication. Consistent with a guiding conceptual framework (Walker & Dotger, 2012), an exploratory factor analysis (n = 266) suggested a two-factor structure: (1) structuring the conversation (α = .92) and (2) responsiveness to parents (α = .87). Confirmatory factor analysis with a second sample (n = 315) also indicated a good fit between the hypothesized two-factor model and the observed data. Despite their lack of experience, student teachers’ self-efficacy ratings were relatively high. Efficacy for structuring conversations (M = 6.7, SD = 1.02; range = 0–10) was lower than efficacy for responsiveness (M = 7.57, SD = 1.04; difference, -0.83, t(581)=−21.32, p < .01). Development of this measure is important because it underscores the complexity of family-teacher conference communication and the need for teacher competence at separate but related facets of communication. Implications for research and teacher education practices are discussed.
KW - Family-teacher communication
KW - Measurement instrument
KW - Self-efficacy beliefs
KW - Student teachers
KW - Teacher education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072968414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072968414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100820
DO - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100820
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85072968414
SN - 0191-491X
VL - 64
JO - Studies in Educational Evaluation
JF - Studies in Educational Evaluation
M1 - 100820
ER -