TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring Ethnic Diversity
AU - Steele, Liza G.
AU - Bostic, Amie
AU - Lynch, Scott M.
AU - Abdelaaty, Lamis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Annual Reviews Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Researchers have investigated the effects of ethnic heterogeneity on a range of socioeconomic and political outcomes. However, approaches to measuring ethnic diversity vary not only across fields of study but even within subfields. In this review, we systematically dissect the computational approaches of prominent measures of diversity, including polarization, and discuss where and how differences emerge in their relationships with outcomes of interest to sociologists (social capital and trust, economic growth and redistribution, conflict, and crime). There are substantial similarities across computations, which are often generalizations or specializations of one another. Differences in how racial and ethnic groupings are constructed and in level of geographic analysis explain many divergences in empirical findings. We conclude by summarizing the type of measurement technique preferred by outcome, when relevant, and provide considerations for future researchers contemplating how best to operationalize diversity. Finally, we highlight two less widely used yet promising measures of diversity.
AB - Researchers have investigated the effects of ethnic heterogeneity on a range of socioeconomic and political outcomes. However, approaches to measuring ethnic diversity vary not only across fields of study but even within subfields. In this review, we systematically dissect the computational approaches of prominent measures of diversity, including polarization, and discuss where and how differences emerge in their relationships with outcomes of interest to sociologists (social capital and trust, economic growth and redistribution, conflict, and crime). There are substantial similarities across computations, which are often generalizations or specializations of one another. Differences in how racial and ethnic groupings are constructed and in level of geographic analysis explain many divergences in empirical findings. We conclude by summarizing the type of measurement technique preferred by outcome, when relevant, and provide considerations for future researchers contemplating how best to operationalize diversity. Finally, we highlight two less widely used yet promising measures of diversity.
KW - ethnic diversity
KW - ethnic fractionalization
KW - ethnic heterogeneity
KW - ethnicity
KW - race
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136445223&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136445223&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-015435
DO - 10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-015435
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85136445223
SN - 0360-0572
VL - 48
JO - Annual Review of Sociology
JF - Annual Review of Sociology
ER -