TY - JOUR
T1 - Meaningfulness in representational fluency
T2 - An analytic lens for students’ creations, interpretations, and connections
AU - Fonger, Nicole L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Representational fluency—the ability to create, interpret, translate between, and connect multiple representations—is key to meaningful understanding of mathematics. This research develops an analytic framework for meaningfulness in representational fluency in linear equation solving tasks. The analytic lens was developed by adapting a structure of observed learning outcome (SOLO) taxonomy. The framework advances a continuum of perspectives including disfluencies and fluencies both within and across representation types. Data from interviews with ninth-grade algebra students solving linear equations with computer algebra systems exemplify the fine-grained analyses of problem solving made possible with this lens. Findings also reveal how lesser meaningfulness in representational fluency may be a productive starting point for more sophisticated reasoning. Implications for research and practice on the interplay between students’ representing and understanding of mathematical ideas are discussed.
AB - Representational fluency—the ability to create, interpret, translate between, and connect multiple representations—is key to meaningful understanding of mathematics. This research develops an analytic framework for meaningfulness in representational fluency in linear equation solving tasks. The analytic lens was developed by adapting a structure of observed learning outcome (SOLO) taxonomy. The framework advances a continuum of perspectives including disfluencies and fluencies both within and across representation types. Data from interviews with ninth-grade algebra students solving linear equations with computer algebra systems exemplify the fine-grained analyses of problem solving made possible with this lens. Findings also reveal how lesser meaningfulness in representational fluency may be a productive starting point for more sophisticated reasoning. Implications for research and practice on the interplay between students’ representing and understanding of mathematical ideas are discussed.
KW - Algebra and Algebraic thinking
KW - Computer algebra system (CAS)
KW - Learning
KW - Meaning
KW - Representational fluency
KW - Representations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061722055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061722055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.10.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.10.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061722055
SN - 0732-3123
VL - 54
JO - Journal of Mathematical Behavior
JF - Journal of Mathematical Behavior
M1 - 100678
ER -