TY - JOUR
T1 - Language-specific and universal influences in children's syntactic packaging of Manner and Path
T2 - A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish
AU - Allen, Shanley
AU - Özyürek, Asli
AU - Kita, Sotaro
AU - Brown, Amanda
AU - Furman, Reyhan
AU - Ishizuka, Tomoko
AU - Fujii, Mihoko
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was financially supported by Grant BCS-0002117 from the National Science Foundation to the first three authors, by a Turkish Academy of Sciences (TUBA) Young Scientist Award to Özyürek, and by the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Substantial logistical support was provided by Boston University, the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, Netherlands, and Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey. Many preschools in Boston, Istanbul, and Tokyo generously allowed us to study the children under their care. Audiences at the Stanford Child Language Research Forum 2002, the Boston University Conference on Language Development 2002, the Canadian Linguistics Association 2004, the University of Connecticut, and the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics offered helpful comments and discussion on previous versions of this paper, as did two anonymous reviewers. We acknowledge with thanks all these contributions to our work.
PY - 2007/1
Y1 - 2007/1
N2 - Different languages map semantic elements of spatial relations onto different lexical and syntactic units. These crosslinguistic differences raise important questions for language development in terms of how this variation is learned by children. We investigated how Turkish-, English-, and Japanese-speaking children (mean age 3;8) package the semantic elements of Manner and Path onto syntactic units when both the Manner and the Path of the moving Figure occur simultaneously and are salient in the event depicted. Both universal and language-specific patterns were evident in our data. Children used the semantic-syntactic mappings preferred by adult speakers of their own languages, and even expressed subtle syntactic differences that encode different relations between Manner and Path in the same way as their adult counterparts (i.e., Manner causing vs. incidental to Path). However, not all types of semantics-syntax mappings were easy for children to learn (e.g., expressing Manner and Path elements in two verbal clauses). In such cases, Turkish- and Japanese-speaking children frequently used syntactic patterns that were not typical in the target language but were similar to patterns used by English-speaking children, suggesting some universal influence. Thus, both language-specific and universal tendencies guide the development of complex spatial expressions.
AB - Different languages map semantic elements of spatial relations onto different lexical and syntactic units. These crosslinguistic differences raise important questions for language development in terms of how this variation is learned by children. We investigated how Turkish-, English-, and Japanese-speaking children (mean age 3;8) package the semantic elements of Manner and Path onto syntactic units when both the Manner and the Path of the moving Figure occur simultaneously and are salient in the event depicted. Both universal and language-specific patterns were evident in our data. Children used the semantic-syntactic mappings preferred by adult speakers of their own languages, and even expressed subtle syntactic differences that encode different relations between Manner and Path in the same way as their adult counterparts (i.e., Manner causing vs. incidental to Path). However, not all types of semantics-syntax mappings were easy for children to learn (e.g., expressing Manner and Path elements in two verbal clauses). In such cases, Turkish- and Japanese-speaking children frequently used syntactic patterns that were not typical in the target language but were similar to patterns used by English-speaking children, suggesting some universal influence. Thus, both language-specific and universal tendencies guide the development of complex spatial expressions.
KW - Crosslinguistic comparison
KW - Development of syntax
KW - Motion events
KW - Spatial language
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845204508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845204508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006
DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 16442518
AN - SCOPUS:33845204508
SN - 0010-0277
VL - 102
SP - 16
EP - 48
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
IS - 1
ER -