Lakatos and neorealism: A reply to Vasquez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

We disagree that our correspondence (Elman and Elman 1995) regarding Schroeder (1994) supports Vasquez's (1997) verdict that the neorealist scientific research program is degenerating. We argue that Vasquez's conclusion is based on a misstatement of the Lakatosian criteria of appraisal and a mistaken conflation of the neorealist research program with the proposition that balancing is a common foreign policy. We do, however, welcome Vasquez's attempt to apply Lakatosian metatheory to international relations theory, and we hope that this conversation will encourage others to follow his lead.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)923-926
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume91
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1997
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lakatos and neorealism: A reply to Vasquez'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this