Kouroi and statistics

Jane B. Carter, Laura J Steinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a well-known series of articles, Eleanor Guralnick undertook statistical studies to compare the proportions of Greek archaic kouroi with one another and with the proportions of the Egyptian second canon; she concluded that Greek sculptors used the Egyptian canon sporadically for proportioning kouroi during most of the sixth century B.C.E. Here, we examine the results of Guralnick's analyses against the backdrop of current statistical method. While we do not believe that her analyses convincingly demonstrate any Greek use of the Egyptian system, we agree that the analyses do distribute the kouroi included in the studies into two main groups. We argue that this division results from the influence of regional styles, rather than from the use of standardized proportional systems. We also examine Guralnick's methodology in cluster, principal components, and z-score analyses and demonstrate that her studies do not provide statistically significant evidence for similarities among Greek kouroi or between kouroi and the Egyptian canon, in part because of the limitations of the statistical techniques employed and in part because of problems in her procedures and data. Thus, we disassociate archaic Greek kouroi from a dependence on the Egyptian standardized proportional schemes and argue instead that the development of regional styles best explains the proportional similarities documented by Guralnick.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-128
Number of pages26
JournalAmerican Journal of Archaeology
Volume114
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

statistics
statistical method
methodology
evidence
Group
Egyptians
Statistics
Canon
Proportion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Kouroi and statistics. / Carter, Jane B.; Steinberg, Laura J.

In: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 114, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 103-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carter, JB & Steinberg, LJ 2010, 'Kouroi and statistics', American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 103-128.
Carter, Jane B. ; Steinberg, Laura J. / Kouroi and statistics. In: American Journal of Archaeology. 2010 ; Vol. 114, No. 1. pp. 103-128.
@article{43cfbc7e86e3481ba90fc0080d7cde50,
title = "Kouroi and statistics",
abstract = "In a well-known series of articles, Eleanor Guralnick undertook statistical studies to compare the proportions of Greek archaic kouroi with one another and with the proportions of the Egyptian second canon; she concluded that Greek sculptors used the Egyptian canon sporadically for proportioning kouroi during most of the sixth century B.C.E. Here, we examine the results of Guralnick's analyses against the backdrop of current statistical method. While we do not believe that her analyses convincingly demonstrate any Greek use of the Egyptian system, we agree that the analyses do distribute the kouroi included in the studies into two main groups. We argue that this division results from the influence of regional styles, rather than from the use of standardized proportional systems. We also examine Guralnick's methodology in cluster, principal components, and z-score analyses and demonstrate that her studies do not provide statistically significant evidence for similarities among Greek kouroi or between kouroi and the Egyptian canon, in part because of the limitations of the statistical techniques employed and in part because of problems in her procedures and data. Thus, we disassociate archaic Greek kouroi from a dependence on the Egyptian standardized proportional schemes and argue instead that the development of regional styles best explains the proportional similarities documented by Guralnick.",
author = "Carter, {Jane B.} and Steinberg, {Laura J}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "103--128",
journal = "American Journal of Archaeology",
issn = "0002-9114",
publisher = "Archaeological Institute of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kouroi and statistics

AU - Carter, Jane B.

AU - Steinberg, Laura J

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - In a well-known series of articles, Eleanor Guralnick undertook statistical studies to compare the proportions of Greek archaic kouroi with one another and with the proportions of the Egyptian second canon; she concluded that Greek sculptors used the Egyptian canon sporadically for proportioning kouroi during most of the sixth century B.C.E. Here, we examine the results of Guralnick's analyses against the backdrop of current statistical method. While we do not believe that her analyses convincingly demonstrate any Greek use of the Egyptian system, we agree that the analyses do distribute the kouroi included in the studies into two main groups. We argue that this division results from the influence of regional styles, rather than from the use of standardized proportional systems. We also examine Guralnick's methodology in cluster, principal components, and z-score analyses and demonstrate that her studies do not provide statistically significant evidence for similarities among Greek kouroi or between kouroi and the Egyptian canon, in part because of the limitations of the statistical techniques employed and in part because of problems in her procedures and data. Thus, we disassociate archaic Greek kouroi from a dependence on the Egyptian standardized proportional schemes and argue instead that the development of regional styles best explains the proportional similarities documented by Guralnick.

AB - In a well-known series of articles, Eleanor Guralnick undertook statistical studies to compare the proportions of Greek archaic kouroi with one another and with the proportions of the Egyptian second canon; she concluded that Greek sculptors used the Egyptian canon sporadically for proportioning kouroi during most of the sixth century B.C.E. Here, we examine the results of Guralnick's analyses against the backdrop of current statistical method. While we do not believe that her analyses convincingly demonstrate any Greek use of the Egyptian system, we agree that the analyses do distribute the kouroi included in the studies into two main groups. We argue that this division results from the influence of regional styles, rather than from the use of standardized proportional systems. We also examine Guralnick's methodology in cluster, principal components, and z-score analyses and demonstrate that her studies do not provide statistically significant evidence for similarities among Greek kouroi or between kouroi and the Egyptian canon, in part because of the limitations of the statistical techniques employed and in part because of problems in her procedures and data. Thus, we disassociate archaic Greek kouroi from a dependence on the Egyptian standardized proportional schemes and argue instead that the development of regional styles best explains the proportional similarities documented by Guralnick.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954153344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954153344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954153344

VL - 114

SP - 103

EP - 128

JO - American Journal of Archaeology

JF - American Journal of Archaeology

SN - 0002-9114

IS - 1

ER -