Judging the other. Responding to traditional female genital surgeries.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditional female genital circumcision, or female genital mutilation, performed upon women in some non-Western cultures has provoked considerable international controversy since the late 1970s. Western feminists, physicians, and ethicists condemn such practice. Having made moral judgement against female genital mutilation, however, what is the next step? There is clearly an impasse between cultural relativism on the one hand and universalism on the other. Those at the forefront of the debate on female genital mutilation must learn to work respectfully with, instead of independently of, local resources for cultural self-examination and change. The authors discuss cultural relativism and moral universalism; female circumcision in sections on epidemiology, health effects, and culture, religion, and social change; the debate historically; the response of Arab and African women; and moving beyond the impasse.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Hastings Center report
Pages31-40
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Publication series

NameThe Hastings Center report
Volume26

Fingerprint

Female Circumcision
Self-Examination
Ethicists
Religion
Social Change
Epidemiology
Physicians
Health

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Female Genital Mutilation
  • Health Care and Public Health
  • Literature Review
  • Twentieth Century

Cite this

Lane, S. D., & Rubinstein, R. A. (1996). Judging the other. Responding to traditional female genital surgeries. In The Hastings Center report (pp. 31-40). (The Hastings Center report; Vol. 26). https://doi.org/10.2307/3527930

Judging the other. Responding to traditional female genital surgeries. / Lane, Sandra D.; Rubinstein, Robert A.

The Hastings Center report. 1996. p. 31-40 (The Hastings Center report; Vol. 26).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Lane, SD & Rubinstein, RA 1996, Judging the other. Responding to traditional female genital surgeries. in The Hastings Center report. The Hastings Center report, vol. 26, pp. 31-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3527930
Lane, Sandra D. ; Rubinstein, Robert A. / Judging the other. Responding to traditional female genital surgeries. The Hastings Center report. 1996. pp. 31-40 (The Hastings Center report).
@inbook{91cada4b76d74c99b48bc2b61747bbb5,
title = "Judging the other. Responding to traditional female genital surgeries.",
abstract = "Traditional female genital circumcision, or female genital mutilation, performed upon women in some non-Western cultures has provoked considerable international controversy since the late 1970s. Western feminists, physicians, and ethicists condemn such practice. Having made moral judgement against female genital mutilation, however, what is the next step? There is clearly an impasse between cultural relativism on the one hand and universalism on the other. Those at the forefront of the debate on female genital mutilation must learn to work respectfully with, instead of independently of, local resources for cultural self-examination and change. The authors discuss cultural relativism and moral universalism; female circumcision in sections on epidemiology, health effects, and culture, religion, and social change; the debate historically; the response of Arab and African women; and moving beyond the impasse.",
keywords = "Ethics, Female Genital Mutilation, Health Care and Public Health, Literature Review, Twentieth Century",
author = "Lane, {Sandra D.} and Rubinstein, {Robert A.}",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.2307/3527930",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "00930334",
series = "The Hastings Center report",
pages = "31--40",
booktitle = "The Hastings Center report",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Judging the other. Responding to traditional female genital surgeries.

AU - Lane, Sandra D.

AU - Rubinstein, Robert A.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Traditional female genital circumcision, or female genital mutilation, performed upon women in some non-Western cultures has provoked considerable international controversy since the late 1970s. Western feminists, physicians, and ethicists condemn such practice. Having made moral judgement against female genital mutilation, however, what is the next step? There is clearly an impasse between cultural relativism on the one hand and universalism on the other. Those at the forefront of the debate on female genital mutilation must learn to work respectfully with, instead of independently of, local resources for cultural self-examination and change. The authors discuss cultural relativism and moral universalism; female circumcision in sections on epidemiology, health effects, and culture, religion, and social change; the debate historically; the response of Arab and African women; and moving beyond the impasse.

AB - Traditional female genital circumcision, or female genital mutilation, performed upon women in some non-Western cultures has provoked considerable international controversy since the late 1970s. Western feminists, physicians, and ethicists condemn such practice. Having made moral judgement against female genital mutilation, however, what is the next step? There is clearly an impasse between cultural relativism on the one hand and universalism on the other. Those at the forefront of the debate on female genital mutilation must learn to work respectfully with, instead of independently of, local resources for cultural self-examination and change. The authors discuss cultural relativism and moral universalism; female circumcision in sections on epidemiology, health effects, and culture, religion, and social change; the debate historically; the response of Arab and African women; and moving beyond the impasse.

KW - Ethics

KW - Female Genital Mutilation

KW - Health Care and Public Health

KW - Literature Review

KW - Twentieth Century

U2 - 10.2307/3527930

DO - 10.2307/3527930

M3 - Chapter

SN - 00930334

T3 - The Hastings Center report

SP - 31

EP - 40

BT - The Hastings Center report

ER -