"It's great when people don't even have their welfare cases opened": TANF diversion as process and lesson

Frank Ridzi, Andrew S London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) encouraged states to reduce welfare caseloads. Caseload reduction can be accomplished by promoting exit for work, marriage, or other private means of support and by diverting new applicants. Most research on caseload decline has focused on welfare-to-work outcomes; less is known about processes of diversion. This study employs administrative records and ethnographic data to examine diversion in West County, New York, from 1999 to 2003. Findings demonstrate a high level of diversion and suggest that application is an ongoing and at times remedial process rather than an event. Diversion occurs at all points of the expanded TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) intake process and is associated with one-time lump sum payments as well as the hassle factor engendered by new eligibility requirements. The encumbered lives of applicants and TANF staff discretion are also implicated as factors contributing to diversion. We conclude with an analysis of the implications of TANF diversion for access to benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)725-743
Number of pages19
JournalReview of Policy Research
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

assistance
welfare
applicant
lump sum payment
marriage
reconciliation
act
staff
responsibility
event
family
personal responsibility
analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

"It's great when people don't even have their welfare cases opened" : TANF diversion as process and lesson. / Ridzi, Frank; London, Andrew S.

In: Review of Policy Research, Vol. 23, No. 3, 05.2006, p. 725-743.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{80e463ec209646479f64c9cced3a6388,
title = "{"}It's great when people don't even have their welfare cases opened{"}: TANF diversion as process and lesson",
abstract = "The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) encouraged states to reduce welfare caseloads. Caseload reduction can be accomplished by promoting exit for work, marriage, or other private means of support and by diverting new applicants. Most research on caseload decline has focused on welfare-to-work outcomes; less is known about processes of diversion. This study employs administrative records and ethnographic data to examine diversion in West County, New York, from 1999 to 2003. Findings demonstrate a high level of diversion and suggest that application is an ongoing and at times remedial process rather than an event. Diversion occurs at all points of the expanded TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) intake process and is associated with one-time lump sum payments as well as the hassle factor engendered by new eligibility requirements. The encumbered lives of applicants and TANF staff discretion are also implicated as factors contributing to diversion. We conclude with an analysis of the implications of TANF diversion for access to benefits.",
author = "Frank Ridzi and London, {Andrew S}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00226.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "725--743",
journal = "Review of Policy Research",
issn = "1541-132X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "It's great when people don't even have their welfare cases opened"

T2 - TANF diversion as process and lesson

AU - Ridzi, Frank

AU - London, Andrew S

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) encouraged states to reduce welfare caseloads. Caseload reduction can be accomplished by promoting exit for work, marriage, or other private means of support and by diverting new applicants. Most research on caseload decline has focused on welfare-to-work outcomes; less is known about processes of diversion. This study employs administrative records and ethnographic data to examine diversion in West County, New York, from 1999 to 2003. Findings demonstrate a high level of diversion and suggest that application is an ongoing and at times remedial process rather than an event. Diversion occurs at all points of the expanded TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) intake process and is associated with one-time lump sum payments as well as the hassle factor engendered by new eligibility requirements. The encumbered lives of applicants and TANF staff discretion are also implicated as factors contributing to diversion. We conclude with an analysis of the implications of TANF diversion for access to benefits.

AB - The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) encouraged states to reduce welfare caseloads. Caseload reduction can be accomplished by promoting exit for work, marriage, or other private means of support and by diverting new applicants. Most research on caseload decline has focused on welfare-to-work outcomes; less is known about processes of diversion. This study employs administrative records and ethnographic data to examine diversion in West County, New York, from 1999 to 2003. Findings demonstrate a high level of diversion and suggest that application is an ongoing and at times remedial process rather than an event. Diversion occurs at all points of the expanded TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) intake process and is associated with one-time lump sum payments as well as the hassle factor engendered by new eligibility requirements. The encumbered lives of applicants and TANF staff discretion are also implicated as factors contributing to diversion. We conclude with an analysis of the implications of TANF diversion for access to benefits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646675849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646675849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00226.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00226.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33646675849

VL - 23

SP - 725

EP - 743

JO - Review of Policy Research

JF - Review of Policy Research

SN - 1541-132X

IS - 3

ER -